Move if you don’t like How things are done…..

e8ffe01c2d13a1f3934aa25b069de49f

I have not weighed in on all the hoopla around Donald Trump and the election but I think it is time….

With all of the colleges and Universities treating our 20 somethings like little kids that need a hug. I am really appalled at the incitement of the young, to take to the streets and protest. The protesting is a real way to start a move like the 60’s but I do not remember anyone beating pregnant women on the way to the hospital or braking car windows to get your point across.

I think that the ultimate dumbing down of our youth has finally happened, when college campuses have to provide group hugs, scheduled “cry-ins”, post-election safe spaces with bubbles, Legos,Play-Doh,  hot chocolate, therapy dogs, coloring books, calming music and videos of puppies. Even going so far as to “cancel scheduled test”!

I knew that Agenda 21 had plans to dumb down people make them weak and re-engineer people’s thinking. Real social engineering. Between the vaccines and the trophies and the entitlements that have been thrust upon them. The cradle to grave agenda is working.  These kids that are now in College are the kids that have been brainwashed into believing that the oceans are rising, the icebergs all over the world are disappearing, the rain is stopping, the ozone is being eaten up, and the rain forest is all but gone, along with much much more. The environment is in severe peril that all human life must cease to exist for this planet to live. Mommy and daddy government is the only hope for the environment.

The college student today has never seen real trials and tribulations in their life. They have never had to gather food to eat. They have never had to fix something to keep it running. They have never had to really count their pennies just to eat. They have never had to walk to get anywhere. They have never had to go without.

The college student today are the most pampered, mollycoddled, spoiled, pandered to, overindulged and  over-protected. These kids have been abuse by their parents. Theses kids parents have lied to them. They have been using them. They have been playing games with them. These kids have had an injustice done to them by their parents and every adult in their life.

Why are these kids even using every penny to stay in college and get an education. Number one an education is highly overrated. Number these kids know nothing when they graduate. And number three they don’t care if they know anything.

These entitled kids are truly disenfranchised. But not for the reasons you think. Many of them are so brainwashed and disillusion at life that they have no hope. With no hope there is no desire to improve. With no hope they have no faith, no faith in anything. Unfortunately they don’t even feel inadequate. They have been given an inflated sense of who they are but they have not been given any hope.

Someone has given them another brainwashing. They think they have been jilted. So they protest, unfortunately they have been stirred up to a frenzy by an organization that wants them to believe that our democracy is wrong and they should change it. They have also been led to believe that their feelings are the only thing that matters, so you change everyone else to suit your feelings.

So my suggestion is to buck-up buttercup, quit being a mamby-pamby, get over it , grow some cojones, quit your cry-ins quit playing with your plah-doh, get some counselling from a real professional and quit your complaining.

gunny

‘Suck it up, buttercup!’: Iowa lawmaker proposes bill punishing schools coddling anti-Trump students — Brittius

Originally posted on tomfernandez28’s Blog: http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Students-protest-trump-win-1280×720.jpg by MIKE OPELKA Following Donald Trump’s win in Tuesday’s presidential election, many high school and college students were having a tough time dealing with the reality of the results. There were reports of mass walkouts, protests and students gathering on campuses to mourn Hillary Clinton’s loss in what…

via ‘Suck it up, buttercup!’: Iowa lawmaker proposes bill punishing schools coddling anti-Trump students — Brittius

Proof of “Uranium One”

The following information is taken dirrectly from  https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release
This shows the connection with the Uraniom in Oregon sold to “Uranium One” The Hammonds should never have been talked to by the Feds. Mr Hammond should never be fined or put in federal prison.

Today WikiLeaks begins its series on deals involving Hillary Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta. Mr Podesta is a long-term associate of the Clintons and was President Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff from 1998 until 2001. Mr Podesta also controls the Podesta Group, a major lobbying firm and is the Chair of the Center for American Progress (CAP), a Washington DC-based think tank. Part 1 of the Podesta Emails comprises 2,060 emails and 170 attachments and focuses on Mr Podesta’s communications relating to nuclear energy, and media handling over donations to the Clinton Foundation from mining and nuclear interests; 1,244 of the emails reference nuclear energy. The full collection includes emails to and from Hillary Clinton.

In April 2015 the New York Times published a story about a company called “Uranium One” which was sold to Russian government-controlled interests, giving Russia effective control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for the production of nuclear weapons, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of US government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off the deal was the State Department, then headed by Secretary Clinton. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) comprises, among others, the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy.

As Russian interests gradually took control of Uranium One millions of dollars were donated to the Clinton Foundation between 2009 and 2013 from individuals directly connected to the deal including the Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Telfer. Although Mrs Clinton had an agreement with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors to the Clinton Foundation, the contributions from the Chairman of Uranium One were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons.

When the New York Times article was published the Clinton campaign spokesman, Brian Fallon, strongly rejected the possibility that then-Secretary Clinton exerted any influence in the US goverment’s review of the sale of Uranium One, describing this possibility as “baseless”.

Mr Fallon promptly sent a memo to the New York Times with a rebuttal of the story (Podesta Email ID 1489).

In this memo, Mr Fallon argued: “Apart from the fact that the State Department was one of just nine agencies involved in CFIUS, it is also true that within the State Department, the CFIUS approval process historically does not trigger the personal involvement of the Secretary of State. The State Department’s principal representative to CFIUS was the Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs. During the time period in question, that position was held by Jose Fernandez. As you are aware, Mr Fernandez has personally attested that “Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter.”

What the Clinton campaign spokesman failed to disclose, however, was the fact that a few days before sending his rebuttal to the New York Times, Jose Fernandez wrote on the evening of the 17 April 2015 to John Podesta following a phone call from Mr Podesta (Email ID 2053): “John, It was good to talk to you this afternoon, and I appreciate your taking the time to call. As I mentioned, I would like to do all I can to support Secretary Clinton, and would welcome your advice and help in steering me to the right persons in the campaign”.

Five days after this email (22 April 2015), Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon wrote a memo to the New York Times, declaring that “Jose Fernandez has personally attested that ‘Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter’,” but Fallon failed to mention that Fernandez was hardly a neutral witness in this case, considering that he had agreed with John Podesta to play a role in the Clinton campaign.

The emails show that the contacts between John Podesta and Jose Fernandez go back to the time of internal Clinton campaign concern about the then-forthcoming book and movie “Clinton Cash” by Peter Schweizer on the financial dealings of the Clinton Foundation.

In an email dated 29 March 2015 (Email ID 2059), Jose Fernandez writes to Podesta: “Hi John, I trust you are getting a brief rest after a job well done. Thanks no doubt to your recommendation I have joined the CAP [Center for American Progress] board of trustees, which I’m finding extremely rewarding.”

Julian Assange