911, Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, Biosphere, climate change, ecology now, ecosystem, environmental impact, Political Correctness, Strong cities, strong communities, sustainable development

California once again doing something zany to combat climate change…….

 

Take a look at what California is doing now. They are using tax payer dollars once again, to paint the streets white. This is to combat climate change. The reasoning is that it will keep the street cooler and keep the earth from warming.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/04/10/los-angeles-painting-city-streets-white-in-bid-to-combat-climate-change.html

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/los-angeles-is-painting-some-of-its-streets-white-and-the-reasons-why-are-pretty-cool/

https://www.popsci.com/la-is-painting-its-streets-white-to-keep-city-cool

http://www.businessinsider.com/los-angeles-is-spending-40000-per-mile-to-paint-streets-white-2018-3

Advertisements
Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, ecosystem, environmental impact, Strong cities, strong communities, sustainable development

Agenda 21(2030) and Wild Lands Project….

I must address the dumb people in the United States that have been indoctrinated into the world agenda. The first item I will addres is the concept of Heritage Sites. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_heritage_site

Heritage sites are part of the Core Wilderness Zones. Each site will have a buffer defined by the U.N. It could be 200 feet, 200 acres or 200 miles. Everything that happens in the Heritage site  will be earnestly monitored by the U.N. These Heritage sites will also be connected to the Core Wilderness Zones. The Core Wilderness Zone will be 50% percent or more of the Americas land mass.

Now you can call these wildernes zones what you want but it is a plan to tie everything together. Sustainable development, economic growth,  International peace and security, embrace migration, inclusiveness, sustainable social development, lifelong learning, equitable and inclusive, gender equality, sustainable water management, sustainable consumption, combat climate change. Do any of these words sound like your community and the verbal vomit that the local politicians may be spewing. What about this:” Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss” .

The real reason for taking land is to move people into the cities to ride bicycles to and from work. abolish personal property and if you do not leave they will force you to leave so they can take the land when you die or are so broke you have to leave. Take away personal property, they take away one of our rights. (Right to life, liberty and the pusuit of property) If you can’t get em off the land by just down right immorral, unethical and UNconstitutional acts,  then try them in an international court in order to prosecute.

Depopulate, take over all land  pack people into the major cities,

UNESCO
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization is a specialized agency of the United Nations. Its purpose is to contribute to peace and security by promoting international collaboration through educational, scientific, and cultural reforms in order to increase universal respect for justice, the rule of law, and human rights along with fundamental freedom proclaimed in the United Nations Charter. It is the heir of the League of Nations’ International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation.

Now Core Wilderness Zones will be areas

Summary of Interpreted TWP Map  http://mtmultipleuse.org/wilderness/summary_of_twp.htm

The Enchantments  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Enchantments

Core Wilderness and Corridors: U.N. influence in Alabama  http://www.citizenreviewonline.org/june_2003/core.htm

Save

Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, Biosphere, climate change, columbia river, ecology now, ecosystem, environmental impact, politics, radiation, Radioactive

Columbia River Fish closings Why…

Columbia river fishing is gone folks and it is Not Global Warming!

http://www.infowars.com/oregon-locals-witnesses-massive-die-off-of-sea-life/

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/12/fukushima-radiation-something-else-causing-mass-die-wildlife-pacific-ocean.html

https://nworeport.me/2014/01/12/massive-die-off-of-west-coast-sea-life-accelerates/

http://www.naturalnews.com/043380_Fukushima_radiation_ocean_life.html

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/16/wes-coast-krill_n_3606349.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0m-cHPQKZvo

 

Biosphere, climate change, ecology now, ecosystem, environmental impact, Nuclear

Nuclear Emergency Tracking Center

A must if you want to know what is happening to the sea life in the Pacific Ocean.

Source: Nuclear Emergency Tracking Center

ecology now, ecosystem, environmental impact, indigenous people, politics, small community life

Weighing in on Standing Rock…..

Not being against the pipeline I did have some, reservations no pun intended, about the route of the pipeline and the possible,  I repeat the possible encroachment on reservation land. I think the  aggressionfrom the feds upon the protesters was to much. So I kept my  eye on what was happening.
The protesters were protesting an environmental possibility. The possibility of a potential pollution of water. The protesters were all up in arms that the pipeline might, I repeat, might pollute the water.
Now that the pipeline is going forth, the protesters have left the sight of a makeshift camp,  of a population in the thousands. People came from all over to support the protest of this would be polluting project.

unused food just left behind...
unused food just left behind…

I must now express my disgust and disappointment in the protesters. Just like other long-term protests that have taken place,  the aftermath is a garbage dump.
The environmental impact on the water supply is disgusting. The human waste is appalling. The tents and tarps and food waste, sleeping bags, blankets, foam pads, plastic totes, containers, styrofoam coolers, cardboard boxes of supplies for living. Large burn barrels, piles of firewood for warming tepees and cooking fires. The unused cases of canned goods and water. The list goes on….

Then as if environmental impact wasn’t bad enough as the protesters leave they set fire to this garbage.

The burning of some of this makeshift camp is a much larger impact than a pipeline that carries oil. The Alaska pipeline (Alyeska pipeline)has been in use for 40 years and has been running pretty smooth. It put 70,000 people to work.http://www.alyeska-pipe.com/TAPS/HistoryDesignConstruction

You make the call but my take is that this was and example of serious hypocrisy!!??

I do beleive the indigenous people were used for someone elses agenda.

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21 impact, Biosphere, BLM, climate change, ecology now, ecosystem, environmental impact, Political Correctness, small community life, Strong cities, strong communities, sustainable development

Is this something you want????????

 

 

 

 

Image result for Un Agenda 21 Depopulation Map

 

Image result for Un Agenda 21 Depopulation Map

 

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21

http://americanpolicy.org/agenda21/

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, ecosystem, environmental impact, GO's (Government Organizations), politics

Obama eyes taking control of the Arctic, adding to Monuments Act | BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades!

In a well thought out piece, we learn that Obama has eyes on the Arctic. Of course, to remove any opportunity for oil and gas exploration and adding to the larder of government controlled land and …

Source: Obama eyes taking control of the Arctic, adding to Monuments Act | BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades!

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, BLM, climate change, ecosystem, eminent domain, Strong cities, strong communities, sustainable development

Proof of “Uranium One”

The following information is taken dirrectly from  https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release
This shows the connection with the Uraniom in Oregon sold to “Uranium One” The Hammonds should never have been talked to by the Feds. Mr Hammond should never be fined or put in federal prison.

Today WikiLeaks begins its series on deals involving Hillary Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta. Mr Podesta is a long-term associate of the Clintons and was President Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff from 1998 until 2001. Mr Podesta also controls the Podesta Group, a major lobbying firm and is the Chair of the Center for American Progress (CAP), a Washington DC-based think tank. Part 1 of the Podesta Emails comprises 2,060 emails and 170 attachments and focuses on Mr Podesta’s communications relating to nuclear energy, and media handling over donations to the Clinton Foundation from mining and nuclear interests; 1,244 of the emails reference nuclear energy. The full collection includes emails to and from Hillary Clinton.

In April 2015 the New York Times published a story about a company called “Uranium One” which was sold to Russian government-controlled interests, giving Russia effective control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for the production of nuclear weapons, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of US government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off the deal was the State Department, then headed by Secretary Clinton. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) comprises, among others, the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy.

As Russian interests gradually took control of Uranium One millions of dollars were donated to the Clinton Foundation between 2009 and 2013 from individuals directly connected to the deal including the Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Telfer. Although Mrs Clinton had an agreement with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors to the Clinton Foundation, the contributions from the Chairman of Uranium One were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons.

When the New York Times article was published the Clinton campaign spokesman, Brian Fallon, strongly rejected the possibility that then-Secretary Clinton exerted any influence in the US goverment’s review of the sale of Uranium One, describing this possibility as “baseless”.

Mr Fallon promptly sent a memo to the New York Times with a rebuttal of the story (Podesta Email ID 1489).

In this memo, Mr Fallon argued: “Apart from the fact that the State Department was one of just nine agencies involved in CFIUS, it is also true that within the State Department, the CFIUS approval process historically does not trigger the personal involvement of the Secretary of State. The State Department’s principal representative to CFIUS was the Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs. During the time period in question, that position was held by Jose Fernandez. As you are aware, Mr Fernandez has personally attested that “Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter.”

What the Clinton campaign spokesman failed to disclose, however, was the fact that a few days before sending his rebuttal to the New York Times, Jose Fernandez wrote on the evening of the 17 April 2015 to John Podesta following a phone call from Mr Podesta (Email ID 2053): “John, It was good to talk to you this afternoon, and I appreciate your taking the time to call. As I mentioned, I would like to do all I can to support Secretary Clinton, and would welcome your advice and help in steering me to the right persons in the campaign”.

Five days after this email (22 April 2015), Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon wrote a memo to the New York Times, declaring that “Jose Fernandez has personally attested that ‘Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter’,” but Fallon failed to mention that Fernandez was hardly a neutral witness in this case, considering that he had agreed with John Podesta to play a role in the Clinton campaign.

The emails show that the contacts between John Podesta and Jose Fernandez go back to the time of internal Clinton campaign concern about the then-forthcoming book and movie “Clinton Cash” by Peter Schweizer on the financial dealings of the Clinton Foundation.

In an email dated 29 March 2015 (Email ID 2059), Jose Fernandez writes to Podesta: “Hi John, I trust you are getting a brief rest after a job well done. Thanks no doubt to your recommendation I have joined the CAP [Center for American Progress] board of trustees, which I’m finding extremely rewarding.”

Julian Assange

Save

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21 impact, BLM, climate change, ecology now, ecosystem, environmental impact, GO's (Government Organizations), life experience, small community life, sustainable development

BLM to resume operations in Gold Butte 2 years after Bundy standoff | St George News

They are back at it again….. BLM will now let the people help them acquire the land that the Bundy ranch now occupies. Lots of nay sayers will say “NO they are not going to do that” because the BLM doesn’t want the land. Then why pull together all the different non-profit conservation groups to put Gold Butte into conservation. This is exactly why the BLM went after the Bundy’s in the first place. The Harry Reid and Chinese project did not work out so now to save face with the UN Agenda 21 bunch they will go forth and put tons of Gold Butte land into conservation. It did work outright so good old Harry will do it the old fashion way. Stir up the conservation bunch (tree huggers, frog lickers, tortoise lovers, rapid eco people). Let crazys go berserk about saving the land and the rocks and the scrub brush and the trees and the cactus and the bugs and bees and tortoise but not the Human being who has ranched the land for 100 plus years. The human being who improved the land for the wildlife. These eco people are from a faction of society that believe that all people are destroying “mother earth”. The ultimate in sustainable development!

Why would any one feel the need to take land away from people who improve the land and give it to a privatized 501-c3 organization just to impose more of Agenda 21 (2030). The corporatizing of united states of America land is a crime!Your tax dollars at work to allow people to take land so they can play on it and no one else can!

READ  the following to see what they are up to……..

BUNKERVILLE, Nev. – The Bureau of Land Management is planning to resume work in the Gold Butte region in northeastern Clark County, Nevada, after two years of absence. BLM employees have not been working in the field in Gold Butte since early 2014 because of safety concerns following an armed standoff with Cliven Bundy and …

Source: BLM to resume operations in Gold Butte 2 years after Bundy standoff | St George News

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21 impact, BLM, climate change, ecosystem, environmental impact, GO's (Government Organizations), life experience, Political Correctness, small community life, Uranium One

Uranium One and Eastern Oregon….

 Go to bottom of post for a link to a video showing more Uraniom One connection to BLM and others.

Wpdms_shdrlfi020l_harney_basin

Uranium One has purchased Uranium thru Hillary Clinton. Thats a problem all by itself. But lets look at the situation with mining the Uranium. First off everyone needs to look at the environmental impact statement of whatever company will be mining the Uranium and look at the mitigation statement of the same.

More than likely there is a huge impact statement plus a large amount of land mitigation. (put land into conservation for said impact) If the Uranium deposit is as large as it appears to be then the mitigation of land will be huge. In simple terms if the land will be affected by mining then an equal or larger amount of land must be put in conservation in order to mitigate the impact of said operation.

Both EIS (environmental impact statement) and mitigation plan are required for operation of said entity whether it is an office building or a mine. So lets say the impact of operation is 200 acres then another 200 acres are required for mitigation of the 200 acre site. Now lets look at other factors will the operation  of said company affect the air quality in the surrounding air. Then this will impact more acreage due to prevailing winds and other environmental factors. Lets say the winds carry a toxin across 300 more affected acres. Then the mitigation will require more land another 300 acres give or take depending upon the fallout of the prevailing winds. Now lets look at the water quality. How much water is affected this becomes a factor as well. Just like the Bundy situation how is the wildlife affected and how much land will be needed for the displacement of wildlife (flora and fauna).

In the case of Oregon the whole eastern side of the state could be part of an environmental impact and require exorbitant amounts of land for mitigation. In that the government would not only have to displace (flor and fauna) they would also have to displace the human element as well. And if the mitigation plan is delayed (there are time lines set for them)more than six months a whole new impact statement is required and a new mitigation plan is made. This process could delay a project by up to 2 years.

So back to the Hammonds the government required the Hammonds to be displaced for mitigation in order to go forth with the mitigation plan on time. When the deadlines approach the organizations panick and get ugly just like they did to the Hammonds.

The following is taken from a document titled:

New Uranium Mining Projects – USA

Oregon

General · Aurora


> See also Issues for: Operating Mines · Decommissioning Projects · Legislation & Regulations
> See also Data for: Deposits, Proposed and Active Mines · Old Mines and Decommissioning


Aurora, Malheur County

> View deposit info

Aurora uranium mine project on hold: According to Oregon Energy, “the project is on ice and not moving forward due to uranium prices and sage grouse issue.” (NRC Memo Dec. 12, 2013)

Notice of Intent provided to submit license application for Aurora project: On Apr. 4, 2012, Energy Ventures Limited external link announced that Notice of Intent to submit a Source Material Facility License Application has been provided to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This notice relates to the proposed development of a uranium processing plant and tailings management facility at the Company’s Aurora Uranium Project.

Company presents project for Aurora open pit uranium mine and mill: The results of Oregon Energy’s test drilling at the Aurora uranium deposit in southeast Oregon has encouraged the company to go ahead with its plans for an open-pit mine at the site, and Oregon Energy’s president Lachlan Reynolds says Oregon Energy is willing to drop $200 million to establish the mine.
Gary Lynch, assistant director of the Mineral Land Regulation and Reclamation Program of Oregon’s Department of Geology and Natural Resources (DOGAMI) external link says Oregon Energy presented its proposal at a public meeting of the DOGAMI governing board on Sept. 13 but the company has not yet submitted an application for a mine.
The mine area, according to Chris Hansen of the Oregon Natural Desert Association (ONDA) external link, is “absolutely core sage grouse habitat.” Sage grouse have been in decline in Oregon. According to ONDA, there is warrant to list the rapidly disappearing sage grouse under the Endangered Species Act, but thanks to politics and a backlog with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the sage grouse is on a waiting list with 250 other species. Two drainages of Cottonwood and McDermitt Creeks go through the site, and Fish and Wildlife documents show that the creeks or their tributaries are endangered species listed Lahontan cutthroat trout habitat.
Oregon Energy plans to process the uranium on the site, which is also a concern for Hansen. (Eugene Weekly Sep. 29, 2011)

The Willamette Week reported on an Australian Company planning to mine the Uranium in Malheur County http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-18572-a_glowing_opportunity.html “It’s uranium—and the county has what may be the biggest sources in the U.S. “

The following is a link to a letter of Agreement to Acquire the Aurora Uranium”.  Pay very close attention to the purchase agreement. Two million dollars for 100% (percent) interest in the property. (for the deposit in Malheur County.)

http://www.australianuranium.com.au/files/Energy%20Ventures%20-%20Aurora%20Uranium%20Deposit.pdf

The following link is to the OregonLive (The Oregonian site. They reported on the deposit in 2012. http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2012/01/malheur_county_targeted_for_go.html

Based on the time frame of these articles and letters of agreement it is about time for the projects to move forward. To do so they must displace all property owners in order to mine the Uranium and Gold. The acquisition of the land is the most important key. If the deposits of these minerals are as large as I think, the whole eastern side of Oregon could be taken for mitigation of these projects.

Here is more proof that Uranium One is doing whatever for the Uranium:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBe3_iZ3HHk