This article is great all about sustainable meat.
You know things are upside down when…
Berkley would not allow a Gay Man to speak at the University. The bastion of free speech in the sixties.
Young people, called the millennial’s, have a parent attend a job interview with and/or for them. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/11/parent-job-interview_n_3907447.html
Antifa calls people fascist when in fact they are the fascist.
LA is painting the streets white in order to combat global warming.
People are being encouraged to keep a window open when operating a air conditioner in order to cool the air outside.
San Francisco has so much Human feces and heroin needles, in public places, that it takes 30 million a year to clean it up.
Free speech is only speech that is sanctioned.
The super elite want to move off planet and are willing to pay trillions of dollars to do it.
Those that are protected by gun toting guards want guns taken away from regular hard working people.
University students need safe places and”free speech zones”.
Violent demonstrations are allowed to take place, over peaceful ones.
People are allowed to threaten the president and nothing is done.
Statues of our history (good or bad) trigger people.
It’s more preferable to help a criminal stay a criminal rather than helping an upstanding legal person.
People put fart bags on cows in order to keep from putting methane in the air to reduce the cows carbon footprint.
We need to save the planet so you can’t use plastic straws.
Decorum is not in peoples vocabulary, let alone not even a thought.
Ethics are bad and bad behavior is good.
An idiot can be elected to the house and people actually voted for her.
Comment on more of what is upside down:
Whether you like to admit what is happening in California or not, the fact is, the agenda is getting what they want. For several years now California has been building lots and lots of stack-n-packs.
Although these small homes look pretty neat to live in, with a pool, a club house, a playground and easy access to metro. Watch the following video to see an example of one of these nice little urban villages all ready for those that have lost their homes in the fires. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tA4WrakreIo
Smart city Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_city
UN Agenda for smart cities: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/partnership/?p=10009
Urbanization Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urbanization#Habitat_Fragmentation
World population plan of action UN : http://www.un.org/popin/icpd/conference/bkg/wppa.html
Kissinger report on United states population control: https://www.hli.org/resources/exposing-the-global-population-control/
Kissinger points out that the control of population can be done thru natural disasters for example with holding food and supplies to victims. In this to control the population and indoctrinate the younger generations they must be in an urban setting. IE stack n pak housing.
My purpose for showing you all of this information is to get you thinking about the firs in California. We already know that Jerry Brown wants kudos from the UN for aggressively implementing the UN agenda.
Between the encroachment of development and the glyphosate and all the chemicals. The genetically modified plants it is a wonder we have any bees left. Big business wants it now, wants it bigger and wants farming corporatized, so they don’t even think about what they are doing, or do they…
Snopes fact check:
The 11 western states with sagebrush-steppe habitat and sage grouse are: Oregon, Washington, California (northern), Nevada, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, North and South Dakota.
Just like saving the salmon land has been purchased, landowners have committed their development rights and projects planned. Government and non-government organizations have spent taxpayer money protecting these species.
BLM is at it again planning a prescribed burn in order to help the sage grouse habitat.Even in BLM’s best efforts to control the land and help habitat of any species, they know not what they do. Th efforts that they make to help seems to really go side ways or is it part of the agenda to remove people from the land or get people(landowners out of someones way.
In Oregon there was a rancher who did not want to sell their ranch to BLM so BLM created a condition that would potentially give them what they want. BLM did some prescribed burns. This forced the Hammond ranch to take steps to protect themselves and their property. The result of that was Mr Hammond and his son were thrown in federal prison and labeled domestic terrorists. These are regular everyday working American people making a living and living the lifestyle they love. Because the fight had gone on for more than 20 years and BLM wasn’t winning. They approached the Hammonds to purchase the property the Hammonds said NO. The “international obligation”created a crisis for BLM and the political party involved.( see my post on Uranium connection https://wordpress.com/post/losingamericanland.com/27485 https://wordpress.com/post/losingamericanland.com/27763 ). By the way the Hammonds were fighting a grazing right issue as well. So when this was discovered by other ranchers dealing with the same issue. Many of these ranchers came together to support the Hammonds and educate the community on the unlawful methods BLM are doing. The BLM has no constitution right to own land and create laws regarding the lands.
At this time point we get the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. The supposed federal refuge was and is the people’s land so the people who occupied the refuge, were and are, in their constitutional right to do so. The wave of understanding in the state of Oregon was growing very fast. The real constitution was being taught to the communities and the opposition to the BLM was growing. Then the FBI was brought in. At this point the FBI and BLM had to do something to stop the opposition and turn the people’s support back. They did do something very dramatic and Lavoy Finicum, a man people loved and respected, lost his life. Please peruse the following link to see the forensic videos and see the drastic measures the government officials went to stop the movement. https://thementalmilitia.net/2017/03/28/forensic-analysis-murder-lavoy-finicum-2nd-page/
If you follow the money and the mitigation plans of businesses within 100 miles of lands in question you will find out why the BLM is making decisions to do stupid things that to most people make no sense. Quite often there will be a political reason behind it. And the Agenda will be moving forward. This agenda could be just as simple as getting land owners backed into a corner that will force them to sell their land. To a degree, the BLM, won. How you say well since Mr Hammond was imprisoned, the BLM forced the Hammonds to sign a “first right of refusal”. This means that if for any reason the Hammonds decide to sell their ranch the BLM gets first crack at it.
The agenda I am talking about through all of this is the UN Agenda.
The BLM wants to burn 30,600 acres of sagebrush in southwest Montana. (48 square miles) Yes Montana has a lot of wide open space but I would venture to say that there are some prime ranches inside this boundary that BLM would love to have or some politician would love to have for some money-making scheme or just simply the UN would like to clear the land and get rid of the ranchers in order to make the land “sustainable”.
The problem with this kind habitat salvation, a prescribe burn, is that the sage grouse will be devastated. It will take years for the land to be habitable for the sage grouse. Just like salmon recovery, these organizations cannot have a successful plan. They cannot have a species return quickly in high numbers. If the species starts returning in high numbers the organization that is doing the projects, will have their budgets cut. All the high paying jobs that worked on the habitat acquisition and monitoring will be reduced greatly and the project will be a success. BLM cannot have that happen.
All government organizations that receive our tax dollars are under the rule of “use it or lose it” So of course they have to make sure that the project continues with no success.
People are extremely naive if they think that this kinda of thing does not happen with our government.
So in conclusion a prescribe burn in southwest Montana is a really, really bad idea. People have lost their freedom and their live because of prescribe burns by BLM.
Jury sides with plaintiff that the weed killer Roundup caused cancer on a former school groundskeeper now the truth is out on glyphosate.
This could set a precedent for more than 4,000 similar cases awaiting trial in federal or state courts.
How many children have been exposed to Roundup (glyphosate)?
Why are all these people dressed in hazmat type suits if glyphosate (Roundup) is so safe?
Glyphosate spraying in Oregon forest to keep underbrush down. What does this do to the wildlife?
Take a look at what California is doing now. They are using tax payer dollars once again, to paint the streets white. This is to combat climate change. The reasoning is that it will keep the street cooler and keep the earth from warming.
I must address the dumb people in the United States that have been indoctrinated into the world agenda. The first item I will addres is the concept of Heritage Sites. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_heritage_site
Heritage sites are part of the Core Wilderness Zones. Each site will have a buffer defined by the U.N. It could be 200 feet, 200 acres or 200 miles. Everything that happens in the Heritage site will be earnestly monitored by the U.N. These Heritage sites will also be connected to the Core Wilderness Zones. The Core Wilderness Zone will be 50% percent or more of the Americas land mass.
Now you can call these wildernes zones what you want but it is a plan to tie everything together. Sustainable development, economic growth, International peace and security, embrace migration, inclusiveness, sustainable social development, lifelong learning, equitable and inclusive, gender equality, sustainable water management, sustainable consumption, combat climate change. Do any of these words sound like your community and the verbal vomit that the local politicians may be spewing. What about this:” Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss” .
The real reason for taking land is to move people into the cities to ride bicycles to and from work. abolish personal property and if you do not leave they will force you to leave so they can take the land when you die or are so broke you have to leave. Take away personal property, they take away one of our rights. (Right to life, liberty and the pusuit of property) If you can’t get em off the land by just down right immorral, unethical and UNconstitutional acts, then try them in an international court in order to prosecute.
Depopulate, take over all land pack people into the major cities,
Now Core Wilderness Zones will be areas
Summary of Interpreted TWP Map http://mtmultipleuse.org/wilderness/summary_of_twp.htm
The Enchantments https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Enchantments
Core Wilderness and Corridors: U.N. influence in Alabama http://www.citizenreviewonline.org/june_2003/core.htm
Columbia river fishing is gone folks and it is Not Global Warming!