Agenda 2030, Agenda 21 impact, Burka, GO's (Government Organizations), Muslim, PC police, Political Correctness, politics, small community life, Strong cities, strong communities, sustainable development, Terrorist

People world wide have had enough…

 

See the source image

Canada, Australia, Germany, France, Czech Republic, Prague, Austria, Belgium, Holland, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.

 

 

The people of these countries have had enough of the crimes being committed by the wave of immigrants that have no respect for the laws of these countries. The people in these countries are tired of the slap on the wrist that these perpetrators get for committing a crime against very young girls. Sometimes these crimes are being committed by 50 men on one victim. These countries have had enough of the madness that has invaded every part of their lives, all in the name of multiculturalism.

Speech is being criminalized. If you speak the truth you will be jailed, censored, banished, ostracized. Every part of Europe have been under suppression so long that the frustration  of not knowing whom will be insulted by a word that the truth can no longer be suppressed. The truth will no longer be silenced.

See the source imageThese revolutionary  protests have been kicked off, because the truth was being revealed by a reporter in the U.K, He was arrested for showing the truth. The truth needed to be squelched, scupper,  suppress · quelled · quashed · subdued · put down · put an end to · crushed · squashed · extinguished · stamped out · put a stop to · stopped · ended · nip in the bud · defeated · conquered · routed.

THE TRUTH WILL NO LONGER BE SILENCED!

The world is saying enough!

Advertisements
Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, environmental impact, GO's (Government Organizations), NGO'S (non-government organizations), Political Correctness, politics, sustainable development

Let’s have a conversation…REALLY…

th

 

I just love all the media when they have some guest on to talk about an issue! The pat cliché saying is “Let’ have a conversation????” Or “We need to have the conversation!” Or some other form referring to the conversation. REALLY What the heck do you think is going on when you are invited onto a broadcast to talk or debate about an issue? Do you think, you people who spew this cliche statement, aren’t having THE CONVERSATION?

It seems to me that those that kneeled during the national anthem started the conversation and people quit talking and took action. Which these so-called national conversations don’t accomplish. Most people who want these national conversations never want action to take place because of these CONVERSATIONS.

Simply put, you people who want to have the “national conversation”, couldn’t come up with a solution for any issue that needs action if you were paid a billion dollars or even to save your life.

TALK! TALK!TALK!TALK! TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!

This has been happening for 30 years or more. Conversations have been going on about so many issues and nothing ever gets done.All media likes talking about the issue but no action is taken. Can’t people get off their arse and do something about what they don’t like happening. Get involved, then report on what progress you are making. The rich and wealthy needs to put thier money where thier mouth is.

Save

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21 impact, GO's (Government Organizations), small community life, Strong cities, strong communities, sustainable development

“Placemaking” or “Spacemaking”……..

 

Image result for images of piano in parks

 

I was reading an article in a local paper about a planning conference that took place recently and I had a good laugh. Looks to me like the adults have lowered to a level of childhood dreaming.

Looks to me like planning will no longer be of the people by the people and for the people it will be “of the UN by the UN for the UN”. A neat little organization called the Project for Public Spaces, a non-profit organization that helps communities create public spaces based around the concept of “placemaking.” This organization I am sure came with strings attached (Federal money) and a mandate to follow the procedures and guidelines laid out. This all fits in with social engineering and changing the way people think about our government officials and what they actually do.

These nice feel good measure might include reclaimed chalkboards to put into a park. Other feel good ideas that actually have been implemented are,  public art, community gardens, bike lanes, etc.

Image result for chalkboard in public spaces

City planning has always been done top down: they announce to the public what they will do, then implement the project. This has been called  the “DAD” approach (decide, announce,defend). But with e the new concept it will be “POP” what the people want (public owns project).

This could include experimenting to see what the public likes. Like a temporary park, for instance, if the people do not like it then scrap it. Put up art and see again, oops maybe not take it down. Little events (of some sort) maybe again the people don’t like it. Now how much money has been spent on trial and error? But according to the “Project for Public Spaces” This is a better way of planning.

But if you do not like it you will be outcast, looked down upon, called ungrateful and maybe even “Deplorable”

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21 impact, environmental impact, GO's (Government Organizations), NGO'S (non-government organizations), Political Correctness, Strong cities, strong communities, sustainable development

More on Agenda 21…Now Agenda 2030…

Source: The Sleuth Journal, by Makia Freeman Agenda 21 is approaching. Communism is coming to America and the world, this time cloaked in green, not red. Private property is under attack. Land is being grabbed by stealth. The US Federal Government is claiming control over more and more land, and kicking rightful owners off their […]

via Agenda 21 – How Would You Like To Be Forced Into A Human Habitat? — sentinelblog

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, ecosystem, environmental impact, GO's (Government Organizations), politics

Obama eyes taking control of the Arctic, adding to Monuments Act | BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades!

In a well thought out piece, we learn that Obama has eyes on the Arctic. Of course, to remove any opportunity for oil and gas exploration and adding to the larder of government controlled land and …

Source: Obama eyes taking control of the Arctic, adding to Monuments Act | BUNKERVILLE | God, Guns and Guts Comrades!

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, BLM, eminent domain, environmental impact, GO's (Government Organizations)

Massive Cover-up: BLM leases Hammond ranch land to Russia through Clinton Foundation donors for uranium

According to The New York Times: “Whether the donations [to the Clinton Foundation] played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical c…

Source: Massive Cover-up: BLM leases Hammond ranch land to Russia through Clinton Foundation donors for uranium

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, environmental impact, GO's (Government Organizations), NGO'S (non-government organizations), Strong cities, strong communities, sustainable development

Property Rights Vs. Environmental takings…

We have seen, especially over the last 40 years, a determined assault on private property rights. It is not coincidental that the passing of the Endangered Species Act marks the beginning of this period. Preservationist groups have accomplished through government coercion what they could not get people to do voluntarily. Increasingly, the cost of perceived […]

via Private Property Rights vs Environmental Feudalism — wryheat

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21 impact, BLM, climate change, ecology now, ecosystem, environmental impact, GO's (Government Organizations), life experience, small community life, sustainable development

BLM to resume operations in Gold Butte 2 years after Bundy standoff | St George News

They are back at it again….. BLM will now let the people help them acquire the land that the Bundy ranch now occupies. Lots of nay sayers will say “NO they are not going to do that” because the BLM doesn’t want the land. Then why pull together all the different non-profit conservation groups to put Gold Butte into conservation. This is exactly why the BLM went after the Bundy’s in the first place. The Harry Reid and Chinese project did not work out so now to save face with the UN Agenda 21 bunch they will go forth and put tons of Gold Butte land into conservation. It did work outright so good old Harry will do it the old fashion way. Stir up the conservation bunch (tree huggers, frog lickers, tortoise lovers, rapid eco people). Let crazys go berserk about saving the land and the rocks and the scrub brush and the trees and the cactus and the bugs and bees and tortoise but not the Human being who has ranched the land for 100 plus years. The human being who improved the land for the wildlife. These eco people are from a faction of society that believe that all people are destroying “mother earth”. The ultimate in sustainable development!

Why would any one feel the need to take land away from people who improve the land and give it to a privatized 501-c3 organization just to impose more of Agenda 21 (2030). The corporatizing of united states of America land is a crime!Your tax dollars at work to allow people to take land so they can play on it and no one else can!

READ  the following to see what they are up to……..

BUNKERVILLE, Nev. – The Bureau of Land Management is planning to resume work in the Gold Butte region in northeastern Clark County, Nevada, after two years of absence. BLM employees have not been working in the field in Gold Butte since early 2014 because of safety concerns following an armed standoff with Cliven Bundy and …

Source: BLM to resume operations in Gold Butte 2 years after Bundy standoff | St George News

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21 impact, BLM, climate change, ecosystem, environmental impact, GO's (Government Organizations), life experience, Political Correctness, small community life, Uranium One

Uranium One and Eastern Oregon….

 Go to bottom of post for a link to a video showing more Uraniom One connection to BLM and others.

Wpdms_shdrlfi020l_harney_basin

Uranium One has purchased Uranium thru Hillary Clinton. Thats a problem all by itself. But lets look at the situation with mining the Uranium. First off everyone needs to look at the environmental impact statement of whatever company will be mining the Uranium and look at the mitigation statement of the same.

More than likely there is a huge impact statement plus a large amount of land mitigation. (put land into conservation for said impact) If the Uranium deposit is as large as it appears to be then the mitigation of land will be huge. In simple terms if the land will be affected by mining then an equal or larger amount of land must be put in conservation in order to mitigate the impact of said operation.

Both EIS (environmental impact statement) and mitigation plan are required for operation of said entity whether it is an office building or a mine. So lets say the impact of operation is 200 acres then another 200 acres are required for mitigation of the 200 acre site. Now lets look at other factors will the operation  of said company affect the air quality in the surrounding air. Then this will impact more acreage due to prevailing winds and other environmental factors. Lets say the winds carry a toxin across 300 more affected acres. Then the mitigation will require more land another 300 acres give or take depending upon the fallout of the prevailing winds. Now lets look at the water quality. How much water is affected this becomes a factor as well. Just like the Bundy situation how is the wildlife affected and how much land will be needed for the displacement of wildlife (flora and fauna).

In the case of Oregon the whole eastern side of the state could be part of an environmental impact and require exorbitant amounts of land for mitigation. In that the government would not only have to displace (flor and fauna) they would also have to displace the human element as well. And if the mitigation plan is delayed (there are time lines set for them)more than six months a whole new impact statement is required and a new mitigation plan is made. This process could delay a project by up to 2 years.

So back to the Hammonds the government required the Hammonds to be displaced for mitigation in order to go forth with the mitigation plan on time. When the deadlines approach the organizations panick and get ugly just like they did to the Hammonds.

The following is taken from a document titled:

New Uranium Mining Projects – USA

Oregon

General · Aurora


> See also Issues for: Operating Mines · Decommissioning Projects · Legislation & Regulations
> See also Data for: Deposits, Proposed and Active Mines · Old Mines and Decommissioning


Aurora, Malheur County

> View deposit info

Aurora uranium mine project on hold: According to Oregon Energy, “the project is on ice and not moving forward due to uranium prices and sage grouse issue.” (NRC Memo Dec. 12, 2013)

Notice of Intent provided to submit license application for Aurora project: On Apr. 4, 2012, Energy Ventures Limited external link announced that Notice of Intent to submit a Source Material Facility License Application has been provided to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This notice relates to the proposed development of a uranium processing plant and tailings management facility at the Company’s Aurora Uranium Project.

Company presents project for Aurora open pit uranium mine and mill: The results of Oregon Energy’s test drilling at the Aurora uranium deposit in southeast Oregon has encouraged the company to go ahead with its plans for an open-pit mine at the site, and Oregon Energy’s president Lachlan Reynolds says Oregon Energy is willing to drop $200 million to establish the mine.
Gary Lynch, assistant director of the Mineral Land Regulation and Reclamation Program of Oregon’s Department of Geology and Natural Resources (DOGAMI) external link says Oregon Energy presented its proposal at a public meeting of the DOGAMI governing board on Sept. 13 but the company has not yet submitted an application for a mine.
The mine area, according to Chris Hansen of the Oregon Natural Desert Association (ONDA) external link, is “absolutely core sage grouse habitat.” Sage grouse have been in decline in Oregon. According to ONDA, there is warrant to list the rapidly disappearing sage grouse under the Endangered Species Act, but thanks to politics and a backlog with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the sage grouse is on a waiting list with 250 other species. Two drainages of Cottonwood and McDermitt Creeks go through the site, and Fish and Wildlife documents show that the creeks or their tributaries are endangered species listed Lahontan cutthroat trout habitat.
Oregon Energy plans to process the uranium on the site, which is also a concern for Hansen. (Eugene Weekly Sep. 29, 2011)

The Willamette Week reported on an Australian Company planning to mine the Uranium in Malheur County http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-18572-a_glowing_opportunity.html “It’s uranium—and the county has what may be the biggest sources in the U.S. “

The following is a link to a letter of Agreement to Acquire the Aurora Uranium”.  Pay very close attention to the purchase agreement. Two million dollars for 100% (percent) interest in the property. (for the deposit in Malheur County.)

http://www.australianuranium.com.au/files/Energy%20Ventures%20-%20Aurora%20Uranium%20Deposit.pdf

The following link is to the OregonLive (The Oregonian site. They reported on the deposit in 2012. http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2012/01/malheur_county_targeted_for_go.html

Based on the time frame of these articles and letters of agreement it is about time for the projects to move forward. To do so they must displace all property owners in order to mine the Uranium and Gold. The acquisition of the land is the most important key. If the deposits of these minerals are as large as I think, the whole eastern side of Oregon could be taken for mitigation of these projects.

Here is more proof that Uranium One is doing whatever for the Uranium:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBe3_iZ3HHk

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21 impact, climate change, GO's (Government Organizations)

AGENDA 21 PLANNERS DON’T WANT TO HEAR QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC. EMPIRE LAKES. – YouTube

You gotta watch this… It is completely unbelievable to think that a grown man would be talking like this. Pay close attention to the “there there”, the doggy wall and the selfie tunnel. Our tax dollars hard at work putting together something that does not need to be planned. Hydroponic planted trees…. ahhhh I thought hydroponics needed water ????… But of course California has no water. But it’s a good laugh….