If you need laugh therapy watch this one…..
Whether you like to admit what is happening in California or not, the fact is, the agenda is getting what they want. For several years now California has been building lots and lots of stack-n-packs.
Although these small homes look pretty neat to live in, with a pool, a club house, a playground and easy access to metro. Watch the following video to see an example of one of these nice little urban villages all ready for those that have lost their homes in the fires. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tA4WrakreIo
Smart city Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_city
UN Agenda for smart cities: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/partnership/?p=10009
Urbanization Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Urbanization#Habitat_Fragmentation
World population plan of action UN : http://www.un.org/popin/icpd/conference/bkg/wppa.html
Kissinger report on United states population control: https://www.hli.org/resources/exposing-the-global-population-control/
Kissinger points out that the control of population can be done thru natural disasters for example with holding food and supplies to victims. In this to control the population and indoctrinate the younger generations they must be in an urban setting. IE stack n pak housing.
My purpose for showing you all of this information is to get you thinking about the firs in California. We already know that Jerry Brown wants kudos from the UN for aggressively implementing the UN agenda.
The 11 western states with sagebrush-steppe habitat and sage grouse are: Oregon, Washington, California (northern), Nevada, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, North and South Dakota.
Just like saving the salmon land has been purchased, landowners have committed their development rights and projects planned. Government and non-government organizations have spent taxpayer money protecting these species.
BLM is at it again planning a prescribed burn in order to help the sage grouse habitat.Even in BLM’s best efforts to control the land and help habitat of any species, they know not what they do. Th efforts that they make to help seems to really go side ways or is it part of the agenda to remove people from the land or get people(landowners out of someones way.
In Oregon there was a rancher who did not want to sell their ranch to BLM so BLM created a condition that would potentially give them what they want. BLM did some prescribed burns. This forced the Hammond ranch to take steps to protect themselves and their property. The result of that was Mr Hammond and his son were thrown in federal prison and labeled domestic terrorists. These are regular everyday working American people making a living and living the lifestyle they love. Because the fight had gone on for more than 20 years and BLM wasn’t winning. They approached the Hammonds to purchase the property the Hammonds said NO. The “international obligation”created a crisis for BLM and the political party involved.( see my post on Uranium connection https://wordpress.com/post/losingamericanland.com/27485 https://wordpress.com/post/losingamericanland.com/27763 ). By the way the Hammonds were fighting a grazing right issue as well. So when this was discovered by other ranchers dealing with the same issue. Many of these ranchers came together to support the Hammonds and educate the community on the unlawful methods BLM are doing. The BLM has no constitution right to own land and create laws regarding the lands.
At this time point we get the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. The supposed federal refuge was and is the people’s land so the people who occupied the refuge, were and are, in their constitutional right to do so. The wave of understanding in the state of Oregon was growing very fast. The real constitution was being taught to the communities and the opposition to the BLM was growing. Then the FBI was brought in. At this point the FBI and BLM had to do something to stop the opposition and turn the people’s support back. They did do something very dramatic and Lavoy Finicum, a man people loved and respected, lost his life. Please peruse the following link to see the forensic videos and see the drastic measures the government officials went to stop the movement. https://thementalmilitia.net/2017/03/28/forensic-analysis-murder-lavoy-finicum-2nd-page/
If you follow the money and the mitigation plans of businesses within 100 miles of lands in question you will find out why the BLM is making decisions to do stupid things that to most people make no sense. Quite often there will be a political reason behind it. And the Agenda will be moving forward. This agenda could be just as simple as getting land owners backed into a corner that will force them to sell their land. To a degree, the BLM, won. How you say well since Mr Hammond was imprisoned, the BLM forced the Hammonds to sign a “first right of refusal”. This means that if for any reason the Hammonds decide to sell their ranch the BLM gets first crack at it.
The agenda I am talking about through all of this is the UN Agenda.
The BLM wants to burn 30,600 acres of sagebrush in southwest Montana. (48 square miles) Yes Montana has a lot of wide open space but I would venture to say that there are some prime ranches inside this boundary that BLM would love to have or some politician would love to have for some money-making scheme or just simply the UN would like to clear the land and get rid of the ranchers in order to make the land “sustainable”.
The problem with this kind habitat salvation, a prescribe burn, is that the sage grouse will be devastated. It will take years for the land to be habitable for the sage grouse. Just like salmon recovery, these organizations cannot have a successful plan. They cannot have a species return quickly in high numbers. If the species starts returning in high numbers the organization that is doing the projects, will have their budgets cut. All the high paying jobs that worked on the habitat acquisition and monitoring will be reduced greatly and the project will be a success. BLM cannot have that happen.
All government organizations that receive our tax dollars are under the rule of “use it or lose it” So of course they have to make sure that the project continues with no success.
People are extremely naive if they think that this kinda of thing does not happen with our government.
So in conclusion a prescribe burn in southwest Montana is a really, really bad idea. People have lost their freedom and their live because of prescribe burns by BLM.
Canada, Australia, Germany, France, Czech Republic, Prague, Austria, Belgium, Holland, Poland, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom.
The people of these countries have had enough of the crimes being committed by the wave of immigrants that have no respect for the laws of these countries. The people in these countries are tired of the slap on the wrist that these perpetrators get for committing a crime against very young girls. Sometimes these crimes are being committed by 50 men on one victim. These countries have had enough of the madness that has invaded every part of their lives, all in the name of multiculturalism.
Speech is being criminalized. If you speak the truth you will be jailed, censored, banished, ostracized. Every part of Europe have been under suppression so long that the frustration of not knowing whom will be insulted by a word that the truth can no longer be suppressed. The truth will no longer be silenced.
These revolutionary protests have been kicked off, because the truth was being revealed by a reporter in the U.K, He was arrested for showing the truth. The truth needed to be squelched, scupper, suppress · quelled · quashed · subdued · put down · put an end to · crushed · squashed · extinguished · stamped out · put a stop to · stopped · ended · nip in the bud · defeated · conquered · routed.
THE TRUTH WILL NO LONGER BE SILENCED!
The world is saying enough!
I just love all the media when they have some guest on to talk about an issue! The pat cliché saying is “Let’ have a conversation????” Or “We need to have the conversation!” Or some other form referring to the conversation. REALLY What the heck do you think is going on when you are invited onto a broadcast to talk or debate about an issue? Do you think, you people who spew this cliche statement, aren’t having THE CONVERSATION?
It seems to me that those that kneeled during the national anthem started the conversation and people quit talking and took action. Which these so-called national conversations don’t accomplish. Most people who want these national conversations never want action to take place because of these CONVERSATIONS.
Simply put, you people who want to have the “national conversation”, couldn’t come up with a solution for any issue that needs action if you were paid a billion dollars or even to save your life.
TALK! TALK!TALK!TALK! TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!
This has been happening for 30 years or more. Conversations have been going on about so many issues and nothing ever gets done.All media likes talking about the issue but no action is taken. Can’t people get off their arse and do something about what they don’t like happening. Get involved, then report on what progress you are making. The rich and wealthy needs to put thier money where thier mouth is.
I was reading an article in a local paper about a planning conference that took place recently and I had a good laugh. Looks to me like the adults have lowered to a level of childhood dreaming.
Looks to me like planning will no longer be of the people by the people and for the people it will be “of the UN by the UN for the UN”. A neat little organization called the Project for Public Spaces, a non-profit organization that helps communities create public spaces based around the concept of “placemaking.” This organization I am sure came with strings attached (Federal money) and a mandate to follow the procedures and guidelines laid out. This all fits in with social engineering and changing the way people think about our government officials and what they actually do.
These nice feel good measure might include reclaimed chalkboards to put into a park. Other feel good ideas that actually have been implemented are, public art, community gardens, bike lanes, etc.
City planning has always been done top down: they announce to the public what they will do, then implement the project. This has been called the “DAD” approach (decide, announce,defend). But with e the new concept it will be “POP” what the people want (public owns project).
This could include experimenting to see what the public likes. Like a temporary park, for instance, if the people do not like it then scrap it. Put up art and see again, oops maybe not take it down. Little events (of some sort) maybe again the people don’t like it. Now how much money has been spent on trial and error? But according to the “Project for Public Spaces” This is a better way of planning.
But if you do not like it you will be outcast, looked down upon, called ungrateful and maybe even “Deplorable”
Source: The Sleuth Journal, by Makia Freeman Agenda 21 is approaching. Communism is coming to America and the world, this time cloaked in green, not red. Private property is under attack. Land is being grabbed by stealth. The US Federal Government is claiming control over more and more land, and kicking rightful owners off their […]
In a well thought out piece, we learn that Obama has eyes on the Arctic. Of course, to remove any opportunity for oil and gas exploration and adding to the larder of government controlled land and …
According to The New York Times: “Whether the donations [to the Clinton Foundation] played any role in the approval of the uranium deal is unknown. But the episode underscores the special ethical c…