ecology now, 911, ecosystem, Agenda 21 impact, Political Correctness, environmental impact, Biosphere, Agenda 2030, climate change, sustainable development, Strong cities, strong communities, Agenda 21

California once again doing something zany to combat climate change…….

 

Take a look at what California is doing now. They are using tax payer dollars once again, to paint the streets white. This is to combat climate change. The reasoning is that it will keep the street cooler and keep the earth from warming.

 

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/04/10/los-angeles-painting-city-streets-white-in-bid-to-combat-climate-change.html

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/los-angeles-is-painting-some-of-its-streets-white-and-the-reasons-why-are-pretty-cool/

https://www.popsci.com/la-is-painting-its-streets-white-to-keep-city-cool

http://www.businessinsider.com/los-angeles-is-spending-40000-per-mile-to-paint-streets-white-2018-3

Advertisements
Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, ecosystem, environmental impact, Strong cities, strong communities, sustainable development

Agenda 21(2030) and Wild Lands Project….

I must address the dumb people in the United States that have been indoctrinated into the world agenda. The first item I will addres is the concept of Heritage Sites. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_heritage_site

Heritage sites are part of the Core Wilderness Zones. Each site will have a buffer defined by the U.N. It could be 200 feet, 200 acres or 200 miles. Everything that happens in the Heritage site  will be earnestly monitored by the U.N. These Heritage sites will also be connected to the Core Wilderness Zones. The Core Wilderness Zone will be 50% percent or more of the Americas land mass.

Now you can call these wildernes zones what you want but it is a plan to tie everything together. Sustainable development, economic growth,  International peace and security, embrace migration, inclusiveness, sustainable social development, lifelong learning, equitable and inclusive, gender equality, sustainable water management, sustainable consumption, combat climate change. Do any of these words sound like your community and the verbal vomit that the local politicians may be spewing. What about this:” Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss” .

The real reason for taking land is to move people into the cities to ride bicycles to and from work. abolish personal property and if you do not leave they will force you to leave so they can take the land when you die or are so broke you have to leave. Take away personal property, they take away one of our rights. (Right to life, liberty and the pusuit of property) If you can’t get em off the land by just down right immorral, unethical and UNconstitutional acts,  then try them in an international court in order to prosecute.

Depopulate, take over all land  pack people into the major cities,

UNESCO
The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization is a specialized agency of the United Nations. Its purpose is to contribute to peace and security by promoting international collaboration through educational, scientific, and cultural reforms in order to increase universal respect for justice, the rule of law, and human rights along with fundamental freedom proclaimed in the United Nations Charter. It is the heir of the League of Nations’ International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation.

Now Core Wilderness Zones will be areas

Summary of Interpreted TWP Map  http://mtmultipleuse.org/wilderness/summary_of_twp.htm

The Enchantments  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Enchantments

Core Wilderness and Corridors: U.N. influence in Alabama  http://www.citizenreviewonline.org/june_2003/core.htm

Save

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, environmental impact, GO's (Government Organizations), NGO'S (non-government organizations), Political Correctness, politics, sustainable development

Let’s have a conversation…REALLY…

th

 

I just love all the media when they have some guest on to talk about an issue! The pat cliché saying is “Let’ have a conversation????” Or “We need to have the conversation!” Or some other form referring to the conversation. REALLY What the heck do you think is going on when you are invited onto a broadcast to talk or debate about an issue? Do you think, you people who spew this cliche statement, aren’t having THE CONVERSATION?

It seems to me that those that kneeled during the national anthem started the conversation and people quit talking and took action. Which these so-called national conversations don’t accomplish. Most people who want these national conversations never want action to take place because of these CONVERSATIONS.

Simply put, you people who want to have the “national conversation”, couldn’t come up with a solution for any issue that needs action if you were paid a billion dollars or even to save your life.

TALK! TALK!TALK!TALK! TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!TALK!

This has been happening for 30 years or more. Conversations have been going on about so many issues and nothing ever gets done.All media likes talking about the issue but no action is taken. Can’t people get off their arse and do something about what they don’t like happening. Get involved, then report on what progress you are making. The rich and wealthy needs to put thier money where thier mouth is.

Save

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21 impact, Biosphere, BLM, climate change, ecology now, ecosystem, environmental impact, Political Correctness, small community life, Strong cities, strong communities, sustainable development

Is this something you want????????

 

 

 

 

Image result for Un Agenda 21 Depopulation Map

 

Image result for Un Agenda 21 Depopulation Map

 

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/outcomedocuments/agenda21

http://americanpolicy.org/agenda21/

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21 impact, GO's (Government Organizations), small community life, Strong cities, strong communities, sustainable development

“Placemaking” or “Spacemaking”……..

 

Image result for images of piano in parks

 

I was reading an article in a local paper about a planning conference that took place recently and I had a good laugh. Looks to me like the adults have lowered to a level of childhood dreaming.

Looks to me like planning will no longer be of the people by the people and for the people it will be “of the UN by the UN for the UN”. A neat little organization called the Project for Public Spaces, a non-profit organization that helps communities create public spaces based around the concept of “placemaking.” This organization I am sure came with strings attached (Federal money) and a mandate to follow the procedures and guidelines laid out. This all fits in with social engineering and changing the way people think about our government officials and what they actually do.

These nice feel good measure might include reclaimed chalkboards to put into a park. Other feel good ideas that actually have been implemented are,  public art, community gardens, bike lanes, etc.

Image result for chalkboard in public spaces

City planning has always been done top down: they announce to the public what they will do, then implement the project. This has been called  the “DAD” approach (decide, announce,defend). But with e the new concept it will be “POP” what the people want (public owns project).

This could include experimenting to see what the public likes. Like a temporary park, for instance, if the people do not like it then scrap it. Put up art and see again, oops maybe not take it down. Little events (of some sort) maybe again the people don’t like it. Now how much money has been spent on trial and error? But according to the “Project for Public Spaces” This is a better way of planning.

But if you do not like it you will be outcast, looked down upon, called ungrateful and maybe even “Deplorable”

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21 impact, environmental impact, GO's (Government Organizations), NGO'S (non-government organizations), Political Correctness, Strong cities, strong communities, sustainable development

More on Agenda 21…Now Agenda 2030…

Source: The Sleuth Journal, by Makia Freeman Agenda 21 is approaching. Communism is coming to America and the world, this time cloaked in green, not red. Private property is under attack. Land is being grabbed by stealth. The US Federal Government is claiming control over more and more land, and kicking rightful owners off their […]

via Agenda 21 – How Would You Like To Be Forced Into A Human Habitat? — sentinelblog

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, BLM, constitution, ecology now, environmental impact, politics, sustainable development, Uranium One

Example of taking land at any cost……..

 

Image result for map of bundy ranch

We now have a perfect example again of taking land at any cost. Obama has, by the stroke of a pen taken large swaths of land for a national monument. If this isn’t enough the feds make a point to take land that has been involved in a controversy with the people. The feds did not like the fact that they had to back down so, after enough time has passed and the American people have forgotten all about it. The feds hate to lose, so they stomp their proverbial feet and abuse their power.
The feds had to back off from a land taking, bullying issue and they are like a bully on the play ground. They did not get their own way so they take a different strategy to take the land anyway. They couldn’t take it by buying it, they couldn’t take it by fining the owner, they couldn’t take it by damaging property, they couldn’t take it by force so they use the pen of the white house to take it.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/12/28/presidential-proclamation-establishment-gold-butte-national-monument
You may say they did not take the land that was privately owned, that may or may not be true! But, by making the property adjacent to the land will mean that the property owner will be put under an exorbitant amount of restriction as to what they will be able to do on the land. If any of the restrictions are violated, even if the restriction goes completely against common sense and constitutional right, fines will be imposed up to and including federal jail time.
We have already seen the federal over reach with the Oregon gentlemen ( Mr Hammond who sits in federal prison). Mr Hammond would not be bullied, he would not sell, he sucked it up and paid fines and still ended up in federal prison. These people know that if they wait out Mrs. Hammond and wait till she is financial troubled or becomes elderly enough to go into a nursing home they will swoop in and take the land. They hope the same thing will happen with the Bundy ranch.

Everyone says “oh they can’t do that” or ” that wouldn’t happen” or even still “why would they do that”.

Those that say these things are in the dark, they are gullible sheeple. They will believe anything the feds tell them.

All over the country as well as the world the land grabs have been going on unchecked and unabated. As long as a fantasy football season is in play there is no one to stop this bunch from implementing Agenda 21 (now known as Agenda 30).

The following articles include eminent domain, and other methods of takings…

https://losingamericanland.com/2016/12/04/eminent-domain-rears-its-ugly-head-again/

https://losingamericanland.com/2016/07/26/property-rights-vs-environmental-takings/

https://losingamericanland.com/2016/05/10/uranium-one-and-eastern-oregon/

https://losingamericanland.com/2016/03/04/reports-company-tied-to-reids-son-wants-land-in-bundy-standoff/

https://losingamericanland.com/2016/02/12/forcing-a-sale-by-any-means/

https://losingamericanland.com/2016/02/01/how-the-epa-separates-landowners-from-their-properties-the-ppj-gazette/

https://www.texastribune.org/2015/11/17/red-river-landowners-take-battle-feds-court/

https://losingamericanland.com/2014/05/24/mitigation-plan-for-nevada-solar-farm-part-2/

 

Save

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, Burka, Muslim, Political Correctness, politics, Strong cities, strong communities, sustainable development

Germany WILL ban the burka: Ministers ‘to order Muslim women to show faces in public’

Global Geopolitics

GERMAN ministers have said they will bring in an effectual ban on the burka by making it illegal for women not to show their faces in public.

Senior members of Angela Merkel’s ruling coalition struck a compromise after the leader expressed unease about the full face veil, but appeared to come out against officially outlawing it.

They will now not legally ban the burka, but will instead bring in new laws requiring people to show their faces in public streets as well as in courts, offices and schools, which will effectively render the garment illegal.

View original post 365 more words

Muslim, Strong cities, strong communities, sustainable development

Slovakia Passes Law Banning Islam from Being a Recognized Religion

Source: Slovakia Passes Law Banning Islam from Being a Recognized Religion

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, eminent domain, environmental impact, Strong cities, strong communities, sustainable development

Eminent Domain rears its ugly head again…..

How soon the American public forgets……. It was not to long ago that people on the east coast were having their property taken away by eminent domain, all for the purpose of increased tax dollars. The couple that had their house taken away from them all for a shopping mall.  The house was bulldozed and the land sits empty.

The following are other examples of eminent domain and a definition of eminent domain;

http://mentalfloss.com/article/63514/7-maddening-examples-eminent-domain

http://money.cnn.com/2005/06/23/news/fortune500/retail_eminentdomain/index.htm

http://www.fostereast.com/Practice-Areas/Eminent-Domain-Condemnation.shtml

http://jeffersonpost.com/opinion/2600/railroading-eminent-domain

https://ihaveagripe.wordpress.com/2016/04/24/the-absurdity-of-eminent-domain/

https://wordpress.com/read/blogs/88075194/posts/12768

https://wordpress.com/read/blogs/104674524/posts/6871

https://wordpress.com/read/blogs/15909850/posts/486647

https://wordpress.com/read/blogs/111228489/posts/55

https://wordpress.com/read/blogs/109115064/posts/260

 

You may think this is all a good idea for more taxes to go to public needs. The biggest problem with this issue is that when the government or a non-profit does it the price they offer for the luxery to eminent domain someones property is pennies on the dollar. There is no fair market value offered. Once an eminent domain form is signed by the owner they have to accept what is given there is no negotiating price. It is called the legal form of “take it or leave it”. I repeat there is nothing FAIR about it.

Now we have another government organization saying they will eminent domain property on an indian reservation with a long stand treaty to not be disturbed. The corporations involved with the pipeline cutting right thru Standing Rock  reservation land are stickin’ it to the indians again. This time the corporations are saying that the oil pipeline is more important than the indigenous people. Where is the UN Agenda 21 committees on Indigenous people.

THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS HAS NO AUTHORITY IN OUR STATES!

Once again whitey is breaking a long-standing treaty with the native people. This issue is not just about the native people it is about the issue of eminent domain and big corporatism.

This eminent domain is against all precepts of our constitution. It is also ethically wrong to just take people’s property to achieve some corporations lust for more.

THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS HAS NO AUTHORITY IN OUR STATES!

This is no difference between the Hammonds in Oregon and the Standing Rock issue.. You may say it is very different but when you find out why things are being done it boils down to corporate money. The Hammond land was/is holding up the Uranium mining. The Standing Rock issue  is holding up big corporate oil companies and big bankers.

Just like the BLM the army corps of engineers do not have a legal right to own land in any state.

Does this look familiar?
Does this look familiar?

 

Image result for Lavoy Finicum Dead Body

 

See the same thing happening! All for a corporation!

THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS HAS NO AUTHORITY IN OUR STATES!

What on earth is the Army Corp of Engineers doing acquiring land for corporations anyway???? This Army Corps of Engineers is not even a legitimate or legal entity that should be telling the American people what they can and cannot do. I will bet you that any documentation and  permits that were required by them were passed with flying colors. I will also  bet you that no mitigation plan for said pipeline was done with DUE DILIGENCE at all. What authority do they have in our states.

Did the mitigation plan include the purchase of land afected by the pipeline probabaly not. This information would be found in the environmental impact statement done by the lead entity of the project.

THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS HAS NO AUTHORITY IN OUR STATES!

Please watch these videos to get an understanding of whats happening:

Save