Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, Uranium, Uranium One

Mitigation plan….

What a mitigation plan covers is:

  • Reduce dust emission.
  • Identify and protect cultural, historical and paleontological resources.
  • Protect Soil from erosion.
  • Minimize the extent and amount of ground disturbance.
  • Restore the original grade and reclaim soil and vegetation.
  • Protect wildlife and wildlife habitat.
  • Minimize lighting in offsite areas.
  • Protect human health by minimizing radiological exposure.
  • Ensure the safe and proper transport of generated ore.

The following taken from the U.S. Department of Interior website : http://www.blm.gov/or/energy/uranium.php

Uranium on BLM-Administered Lands in OR/WA

In September 2011, a representative from Oregon Energy, L.L.C. (formally Uranium One), met with local citizens, and county and state officials, to discuss the possibility of opening a uranium oxide (“yellowcake”) mine in southern Malheur County in southeastern Oregon. Oregon Energy is interested in developing a 17-Claim parcel of land known as the Aurora Project through an open pit mining method. Besides the mine, there would be a mill for processing. The claim area occupies about 450 acres and is also referred to as the “New U” uranium claims.

On May 7, 2012, Oregon Energy LLC made a presentation to the BLM outlining its plans for development for the mine.

The Vale District has agreed to work with Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife on mitigation for the “New U” uranium claims, which are located in core sage grouse habitat. Although the lands encompassing the claims have been designated core, the area is frequented by rockhounds and hunters, and has a crisscrossing of off-highway vehicle (OHV) roads and other significant land disturbance from the defunct Bretz Mercury Mine, abandoned in the 1960s.

However, by the fall of 2012 the company said that it was putting its plans for the mine on hold until the uncertainty surrounding sage grouse issues was resolved.

Location information for the Aurora Project can be found on the “Non-Renewable Energy Projects of Oregon” map at this website: http://www.blm.gov/or/energy.

What you do not realize is how insidious the taking of land is for the sale of Uranium. The sage grouse issue is to make people believe that all the land taking  is to save something for the future generation. The Federal government has pushed through the sale which in turn pushes the purchase of property by any means. The BLM (federal organization) will harass property owners. They will lie to property owners, telling them they will be fined if they do anything on their own land that threatens a lizard,  an owl habitat, a fish habitat, a sage grouse.

The Federal agencies will even go so far as to put an innocent law-abiding citizen in Federal prison to accomplish their goal. Especially if that citizen is holding up a project.

 

Advertisements
Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, Uranium, Uranium One

Uranium Connection and the land in Southern Oregon…..

 

Agenda 21/Agenda 2030 at work thru our past secretary of state. I posted about Uranium One https://losingamericanland.com/2016/11/06/proof-of-uranium-one.

I followed the money and the reasons why land was being taken in Harney County Oregon. This is why Dwight Hammond (age 74) is sitting in a federal prison. Initially the sentence for Dwight (Father) was 3 months in prison and Steven (son) was 12 months in federal prison. Both were also stipulated to pay $400,000 to the BLM. The judge said “that sentence is too short”.  Sometime in June 2014, Rhonda Karges, Field Manager for the BLM, and her husband Chad Karges, Refuge Manager for the Malheur Wildlife Refuge (which surrounds the Hammond ranch), along with attorney Frank Papagni exemplified further vindictive behavior by filing an appeal with the 9th District Federal Court seeking Dwight’s and Steven’s return to federal prison for the entire 5 years. The Hammonds serve their original sentences and to date they have paid $200,000 to the BLM, and the remainder $200,000 must be paid before the end of year (2015). If the Hammonds cannot pay the fines to the BLM, they will be forced to sell the ranch to the BLM or face further prosecution. (Coercion to sell their ranch , I think so).See the history of Dwight and Steven Hammond: http://www.prcforum.com/forum/157-political-discussions/69473-history-behind-hammond-ranch-blm.html

Incidentally the Hammond Ranch is surrounded by the Malheur Wildlife Refuge.

The out cry resulted in a take over of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge and the murder of a man who had not even a parking ticket on his record. Yes murder is a harsh way to put the killing of a man by the FBI.

The reasons why this happened goes deeper than the take-over of the wildlife refuge.

The Uranium One  deal had already been done and the project to start mining the Uranium was being held up by one rancher who would not sell his land to the federal government. Making it look like the reasons for doing all the land buying was the save the grouse campaign. When in fact it was a Uranium deal negotiated by the Federal government. Go to the mitigation plan and the environmental impact statement to see how much land is needed.

The UN mandate to take the land for ecology purposes were also a front for acquiring the land in order to get at one of the bigger uranium deposits in the US. Incidentally there are large deposits of gold also.

I discovered this during the Burns Oregon standoff January 2016. The mitigation of such a project usually takes large parcels of land to satisfy the UN mandates on ecology and wildlife. A mitigation plan does not actually take into account human lives that will be affected and they (the feds, the UN, government officials involved) do anything to force a  sale of needed property. The facade of a payment looks good to the populous but the price is never a fair market value of the land. As a matter of fact all kinds of very interesting things happen to a persons land that is targeted by the BLM. Sudden devastating flooding, enormous fires, limited access, new regulations and even threats of jail time if you don’t obey an implied regulation and or policy. If a biologist has identified a possible, endangered species on your land, you will be fined and or arrested for endangering the said species.

The devastation of flooding to a rancher is “Not only can you not grow your winter feed but it kills all of your perennial grasses” This can mean sure financial hardship.

A simplest solution has been sought — a canal to drain the water from the closed basin into the Snake River — But when the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers determined the project’s benefit-to-cost ratio was too low http://www.disasternews.net/news/article.php?articleid=742 Theres the Army Corps of engineers in their infinite wisdom rearing their ugly head. Lets see where else have we heard them doing untoward things to people —mmmm  oh yes the flooding in New Orleans after Katrina, They conveniently did not fix the dyke—- That’s right! They had the money but just didn’t fix it!https://wordpress.com/post/losingamericanland.com/383

The following link is an excellent run down on the fires in Harney county and how the BLM just kept the fire burning in order to burn out the ranchers and devastate them. Please take some time to read it: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/22484-oregon-standoff-blm-s-burn-em-out-legacy-the-untold-backstory

During the 1970’s the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), in conjunction with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), took a different approach to get the ranchers to sell. Ranchers were told that, “grazing was detrimental to wildlife and must be reduced”. 32 out of 53 permits were revoked and many ranchers were forced sell. Grazing fees were raised significantly for those that did not sell. Refuge personnel(BLM) took over the irrigation system claiming it as their own.

Human life on a ranch is a hard life but it is a life that people choose.

If a person looks at what is going on within a 50 mile radius of the Hammond Ranch, the devastation that took place is appalling. Ranches were being bought up by the federal government. Call it BLM or some other agency working to complete a mitigation plan for the preparation to start a mining or multiple mining projects.

Ultimately the injustice of the whole project has hit the core of many people and they took action by taking over the Malheur Wildlife Refuge, in order to make the American people aware of the unlawful methods of the Federal Government and their hired mercenaries.

When connecting the dots the purchase of Uranium by the Russian company killed Lavoy Finicum and put an innocent hard-working rancher in Federal Prison.

Mineral resources in Harney County Oregon

https://www.blm.gov/or/energy/uranium.php

http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2012/01/malheur_county_targeted_for_go.html

Other examples of BLM buying land……

http://blog.oregonlive.com/myoregon/2010/03/oregon_buys_land_for_blm.html

http://www.mailtribune.com/article/20150113/News/150119865

1986 BLM purchase in Harney county and today BLM operates a ranch?  https://www.blm.gov/visit/riddle-brothers-ranch-national-historic-district

https://www.blm.gov/visit/diamond-craters-outstanding-natural-area

https://www.blm.gov/visit/steens-mountain-cmpa

https://www.blm.gov/visit/birch-creek-historic-ranch

https://www.blm.gov/visit/mann-lake-recreation-site

https://www.blm.gov/visit/mickey-hot-springs

https://www.blm.gov/visit/steens-mountain-wilderness

https://www.blm.gov/visit/jackman-park-recreation-site

 

I must add that all “International Obligations” will trump any and all need to reserve, preserve or otherwise save land. Now that said there is an agenda at the UN that will force preservation of land, but that of course will be considered an “International obligation”. When any of the Federal alphabet soups are told to do something to meet the “International Obligation” all bets are off. The alphabet soup bunch will carry out any and all untoward actions to secure whatever obligation is required. Coercion, demonizing, destruction of life, destruction of property and imprisonment, to accomplish their goal. The alphabet soup bunch sees this as thier duty to accomplish the “International Obligation by any means”. Until the American people see this as truth and stand up to this it will continue to happen. In this that is why we see the continual abuse of the Bundy family, the Hammond family, Lavoy Finicum and many others that have never been put in the spot light, as these people have.

Save

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, BLM, constitution, ecology now, environmental impact, politics, sustainable development, Uranium One

Example of taking land at any cost……..

 

Image result for map of bundy ranch

We now have a perfect example again of taking land at any cost. Obama has, by the stroke of a pen taken large swaths of land for a national monument. If this isn’t enough the feds make a point to take land that has been involved in a controversy with the people. The feds did not like the fact that they had to back down so, after enough time has passed and the American people have forgotten all about it. The feds hate to lose, so they stomp their proverbial feet and abuse their power.
The feds had to back off from a land taking, bullying issue and they are like a bully on the play ground. They did not get their own way so they take a different strategy to take the land anyway. They couldn’t take it by buying it, they couldn’t take it by fining the owner, they couldn’t take it by damaging property, they couldn’t take it by force so they use the pen of the white house to take it.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/12/28/presidential-proclamation-establishment-gold-butte-national-monument
You may say they did not take the land that was privately owned, that may or may not be true! But, by making the property adjacent to the land will mean that the property owner will be put under an exorbitant amount of restriction as to what they will be able to do on the land. If any of the restrictions are violated, even if the restriction goes completely against common sense and constitutional right, fines will be imposed up to and including federal jail time.
We have already seen the federal over reach with the Oregon gentlemen ( Mr Hammond who sits in federal prison). Mr Hammond would not be bullied, he would not sell, he sucked it up and paid fines and still ended up in federal prison. These people know that if they wait out Mrs. Hammond and wait till she is financial troubled or becomes elderly enough to go into a nursing home they will swoop in and take the land. They hope the same thing will happen with the Bundy ranch.

Everyone says “oh they can’t do that” or ” that wouldn’t happen” or even still “why would they do that”.

Those that say these things are in the dark, they are gullible sheeple. They will believe anything the feds tell them.

All over the country as well as the world the land grabs have been going on unchecked and unabated. As long as a fantasy football season is in play there is no one to stop this bunch from implementing Agenda 21 (now known as Agenda 30).

The following articles include eminent domain, and other methods of takings…

https://losingamericanland.com/2016/12/04/eminent-domain-rears-its-ugly-head-again/

https://losingamericanland.com/2016/07/26/property-rights-vs-environmental-takings/

https://losingamericanland.com/2016/05/10/uranium-one-and-eastern-oregon/

https://losingamericanland.com/2016/03/04/reports-company-tied-to-reids-son-wants-land-in-bundy-standoff/

https://losingamericanland.com/2016/02/12/forcing-a-sale-by-any-means/

https://losingamericanland.com/2016/02/01/how-the-epa-separates-landowners-from-their-properties-the-ppj-gazette/

https://www.texastribune.org/2015/11/17/red-river-landowners-take-battle-feds-court/

https://losingamericanland.com/2014/05/24/mitigation-plan-for-nevada-solar-farm-part-2/

 

Save

Agenda 21, Biosphere, BLM, politics, Uranium, Uranium One

More Uranium One and the need for Uranium….

Is NUCLEAR ENERGY Really GREEN? Canada is burning so more Nuclear weapons and power can be made!

http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/calgarybusiness/story.html?id=e1da89f1-0f1e-4aa0-ac04-a34fb02cabb8

The following companies are performing uranium prospecting and/or exploration in Alberta: CanAlaska Ventures Limited , Firestone Ventures Inc. , International Ranger Corp. , Marum Resources Inc. , North American Gem Inc. , Geo Minerals Ltd. , AREVA Resources Canada Inc., Solitaire Minerals Corp. , Thelon Ventures Ltd. , Triex Minerals Corporation , Yellowcake PLC , Roughrider Uranium Corp., Fission Uranium Corp. , Tribune Minerals Corp. , Black Hawk Exploration Inc. , DNI Metals Inc. , Brazil Resources Inc.

The following link is a PDF file that is a summary from the  Alberta Geological Survey. The summary describes the investigation for uranium potential of Southern Alberta since 2006:

http://cseg.ca/assets/files/resources/abstracts/2010/0525_GC2010_Sandstone-Hosted_Uranium_in_Southern_Alberta.pdf

This link shows Canada Uranium production:

http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/canada-uranium.aspx

More companies looking at Uranium Mining in the fire zone:

http://www.athabascanuclear.com/

http://atomenergyinc.com/

 

The following is a news release off of the Uranium One website:

Bay Adelaide Centre • Suite 1710, Box 23
Toronto • ON • CANADA • M5H 2R2
Uranium One Inc. Announces Termination of Debentures and Application to Cease to be a Reporting Issuer
TORONTO, January 30, 2015/CNW/ – Uranium One Inc. (“Uranium One” or the “Corporation”) today announced that it plans to discharge its outstanding unsecured subordinated debentures. The debentures, of which C$32.524 million principal amount is outstanding, are listed for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) under the symbol “UUU.DB.A.” and are scheduled to mature on March 13, 2015.
The Corporation intends to discharge the trust indenture governing the debentures, and to immediately terminate the debentures, as of February 5, 2015. Uranium One will pay to debentureholders of record as of that date the principle amount of the debentures, plus the interest payments on the debentures through to their scheduled maturity date. The funds will be deposited with the indenture trustee. As soon as it is practical after the discharge, the debentures will be de-listed from the TSX.
In connection with the termination of the debentures, Uranium One applied to the securities regulatory authorities in each of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador for a decision deeming it to have ceased to be a reporting issuer in such jurisdictions.
If the requested decision is made by the securities regulatory authorities, the Corporation will cease being a reporting issuer in any jurisdiction in Canada and, as a result, will no longer be required to file financial statements and other continuous disclosure documents with Canadian securities regulatory authorities. The Corporation will continue to make the disclosures required to the holders of its remaining securities outstanding, being its Ruble Bonds Series 1 and 2 and the Senior Secured Notes issued by Uranium One Investments Inc.
About Uranium One:
Uranium One is one of the world’s largest uranium producers with a globally diversified portfolio of assets located in Kazakhstan, the United States, Australia and Tanzania. ROSATOM State Atomic Energy Corporation, through its affiliates, owns 100% of the outstanding common shares of Uranium One.
For further information about Uranium One, please visit http://www.uranium1.com
| 2
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
Chris Sattler
Chief Executive Officer
Tel: +1 647 788 8500
Juliana Lam
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Tel: +1 647 788 8500
Cautionary Statement
No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein.
Forward-looking statements:
This press release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of applicable securities laws that are intended to be covered by the safe harbours created by those laws, including statements that use forward-looking terminology such as “may”, “will”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “continue”, “potential”, or the negative thereof or other variations thereof or comparable terminology. Such forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, statements regarding the completion of the proposed discharge of debentures and other statements that are not historical facts. While such forward-looking statements are expressed by Uranium One, as stated in this release, in good faith and believed by Uranium One to have a reasonable basis, they are subject to important risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected or implied by the forward-looking statements. As a result of these risks and uncertainties, the results or events predicted in these forward-looking statements may differ materially from actual results or events. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, given that they involve risks and uncertainties. Uranium One is not affirming or adopting any statements made by any other person in respect of the proposed discharge of the debentures and expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws, or to comment on expectations of, or statements made by any other person in respect of the proposed transaction. Investors should not assume that any lack of update to a previously issued forward-looking statement constitutes a reaffirmation of that statement. Reliance on forward-looking statements is at investors’ own risk.

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21 impact, BLM, climate change, ecosystem, environmental impact, GO's (Government Organizations), life experience, Political Correctness, small community life, Uranium One

Uranium One and Eastern Oregon….

 Go to bottom of post for a link to a video showing more Uraniom One connection to BLM and others.

Wpdms_shdrlfi020l_harney_basin

Uranium One has purchased Uranium thru Hillary Clinton. Thats a problem all by itself. But lets look at the situation with mining the Uranium. First off everyone needs to look at the environmental impact statement of whatever company will be mining the Uranium and look at the mitigation statement of the same.

More than likely there is a huge impact statement plus a large amount of land mitigation. (put land into conservation for said impact) If the Uranium deposit is as large as it appears to be then the mitigation of land will be huge. In simple terms if the land will be affected by mining then an equal or larger amount of land must be put in conservation in order to mitigate the impact of said operation.

Both EIS (environmental impact statement) and mitigation plan are required for operation of said entity whether it is an office building or a mine. So lets say the impact of operation is 200 acres then another 200 acres are required for mitigation of the 200 acre site. Now lets look at other factors will the operation  of said company affect the air quality in the surrounding air. Then this will impact more acreage due to prevailing winds and other environmental factors. Lets say the winds carry a toxin across 300 more affected acres. Then the mitigation will require more land another 300 acres give or take depending upon the fallout of the prevailing winds. Now lets look at the water quality. How much water is affected this becomes a factor as well. Just like the Bundy situation how is the wildlife affected and how much land will be needed for the displacement of wildlife (flora and fauna).

In the case of Oregon the whole eastern side of the state could be part of an environmental impact and require exorbitant amounts of land for mitigation. In that the government would not only have to displace (flor and fauna) they would also have to displace the human element as well. And if the mitigation plan is delayed (there are time lines set for them)more than six months a whole new impact statement is required and a new mitigation plan is made. This process could delay a project by up to 2 years.

So back to the Hammonds the government required the Hammonds to be displaced for mitigation in order to go forth with the mitigation plan on time. When the deadlines approach the organizations panick and get ugly just like they did to the Hammonds.

The following is taken from a document titled:

New Uranium Mining Projects – USA

Oregon

General · Aurora


> See also Issues for: Operating Mines · Decommissioning Projects · Legislation & Regulations
> See also Data for: Deposits, Proposed and Active Mines · Old Mines and Decommissioning


Aurora, Malheur County

> View deposit info

Aurora uranium mine project on hold: According to Oregon Energy, “the project is on ice and not moving forward due to uranium prices and sage grouse issue.” (NRC Memo Dec. 12, 2013)

Notice of Intent provided to submit license application for Aurora project: On Apr. 4, 2012, Energy Ventures Limited external link announced that Notice of Intent to submit a Source Material Facility License Application has been provided to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC). This notice relates to the proposed development of a uranium processing plant and tailings management facility at the Company’s Aurora Uranium Project.

Company presents project for Aurora open pit uranium mine and mill: The results of Oregon Energy’s test drilling at the Aurora uranium deposit in southeast Oregon has encouraged the company to go ahead with its plans for an open-pit mine at the site, and Oregon Energy’s president Lachlan Reynolds says Oregon Energy is willing to drop $200 million to establish the mine.
Gary Lynch, assistant director of the Mineral Land Regulation and Reclamation Program of Oregon’s Department of Geology and Natural Resources (DOGAMI) external link says Oregon Energy presented its proposal at a public meeting of the DOGAMI governing board on Sept. 13 but the company has not yet submitted an application for a mine.
The mine area, according to Chris Hansen of the Oregon Natural Desert Association (ONDA) external link, is “absolutely core sage grouse habitat.” Sage grouse have been in decline in Oregon. According to ONDA, there is warrant to list the rapidly disappearing sage grouse under the Endangered Species Act, but thanks to politics and a backlog with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the sage grouse is on a waiting list with 250 other species. Two drainages of Cottonwood and McDermitt Creeks go through the site, and Fish and Wildlife documents show that the creeks or their tributaries are endangered species listed Lahontan cutthroat trout habitat.
Oregon Energy plans to process the uranium on the site, which is also a concern for Hansen. (Eugene Weekly Sep. 29, 2011)

The Willamette Week reported on an Australian Company planning to mine the Uranium in Malheur County http://www.wweek.com/portland/article-18572-a_glowing_opportunity.html “It’s uranium—and the county has what may be the biggest sources in the U.S. “

The following is a link to a letter of Agreement to Acquire the Aurora Uranium”.  Pay very close attention to the purchase agreement. Two million dollars for 100% (percent) interest in the property. (for the deposit in Malheur County.)

http://www.australianuranium.com.au/files/Energy%20Ventures%20-%20Aurora%20Uranium%20Deposit.pdf

The following link is to the OregonLive (The Oregonian site. They reported on the deposit in 2012. http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2012/01/malheur_county_targeted_for_go.html

Based on the time frame of these articles and letters of agreement it is about time for the projects to move forward. To do so they must displace all property owners in order to mine the Uranium and Gold. The acquisition of the land is the most important key. If the deposits of these minerals are as large as I think, the whole eastern side of Oregon could be taken for mitigation of these projects.

Here is more proof that Uranium One is doing whatever for the Uranium:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QBe3_iZ3HHk