Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, BLM, constitution, ecosystem, environmental impact, GO's (Government Organizations), politics, salmon, small community life, sustainable development, Uranium

BLM at it again……

The 11 western states with sagebrush-steppe habitat and sage grouse are: Oregon, Washington, California (northern), Nevada, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, Colorado, Utah, North and South Dakota.

Screenshot_2018-11-08 Bringing Healthy Sagebrush Communities Full Circle
sage  grouse habitat https://nrcs.maps.arcgis.com/apps/Cascade/index.html?appid=1432f0c5f9cf4031a24df2e6f479b8eb

Just like saving the salmon land has been purchased, landowners have committed their development rights and projects planned. Government and non-government organizations have spent taxpayer money protecting these species.

BLM is at it again planning  a prescribed burn in order to help the sage grouse habitat.Even in BLM’s best efforts to control the land and help habitat of any species, they know not what they do. Th efforts that they make to help seems to really go side ways or is it part of the agenda to remove people from the land or get people(landowners out of someones way.

In Oregon there was a rancher who did not want to sell their ranch to BLM so BLM created a condition that would potentially give them what they want. BLM did some prescribed burns. This forced the Hammond ranch to take steps to protect themselves and their property. The result of that was Mr Hammond and his son were thrown in federal prison and labeled domestic terrorists. These are regular everyday working American people making a living and living the lifestyle they love.  Because the fight had gone on for more than 20 years  and BLM wasn’t winning. They approached the Hammonds to purchase the property the Hammonds said NO. The “international obligation”created a crisis for BLM and the political party involved.( see my post on Uranium connection https://wordpress.com/post/losingamericanland.com/27485  https://wordpress.com/post/losingamericanland.com/27763 ). By the way the Hammonds were fighting a grazing right issue as well. So when this was discovered by other ranchers dealing with the same issue. Many of these ranchers came together to support the Hammonds and educate the community on the unlawful methods BLM are doing. The BLM has no constitution right to own land and create laws regarding the lands.

At this time point we get the  Malheur National Wildlife Refuge. The supposed federal refuge was and is the people’s land so the people who occupied the refuge, were and are, in their constitutional right to do so. The wave of understanding in the state of Oregon was growing very fast. The real constitution was being taught to the communities and the opposition to the BLM was growing. Then the FBI was brought in. At this point the FBI and BLM had to do something to stop the opposition and turn the people’s support back. They did do something very dramatic and  Lavoy Finicum, a man people loved and respected, lost his life. Please peruse the following link to see the forensic videos and see the drastic measures the government officials went to stop the movement. https://thementalmilitia.net/2017/03/28/forensic-analysis-murder-lavoy-finicum-2nd-page/

If you follow the money and the mitigation plans of businesses within 100 miles of lands in question you will find out why the BLM is making decisions to do stupid things that to most people make no sense. Quite often there will be a political reason behind it. And the Agenda will be moving forward. This agenda could be just as simple as getting land owners backed into a corner that will force them to sell their land. To a degree, the BLM,  won. How you say well since Mr Hammond was imprisoned, the BLM forced the Hammonds to sign a “first right of refusal”. This means that if for any reason the Hammonds decide to sell their ranch the BLM gets first crack at it.

The agenda I am talking about through all of this is the UN Agenda.

See the source image

The BLM wants to burn 30,600 acres of sagebrush in southwest Montana. (48 square miles) Yes Montana has a lot of wide open space but I would venture to say that there are some prime ranches inside this boundary that BLM would love to have or some politician would love to have for some money-making scheme or just simply the UN would like to clear the land and get rid of the ranchers in order to make the land “sustainable”.

See the source image

The problem with this kind habitat salvation, a prescribe burn, is that the sage grouse will be devastated. It will take years for the land to be habitable for the sage grouse. Just like salmon recovery, these organizations cannot have a successful plan. They cannot have a species return quickly in high numbers. If the species starts returning in high numbers the organization that is doing the projects, will have their budgets cut. All the high paying jobs that worked on the habitat acquisition and monitoring will be reduced greatly and the project will be a success. BLM cannot have that happen.

All government organizations that receive our tax dollars are under the rule of “use it or lose it” So of course they have to make sure that the project continues with no success.

People are extremely naive if they think that this kinda of thing does not happen with our government.

So in conclusion a prescribe burn in southwest Montana is a really, really bad idea. People have lost their freedom and their live because of prescribe burns by BLM.

https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/11/07/burning-sagebrush-will-not-save-endangered-grouse/

 

Advertisements
Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, Uranium, Uranium One

Mitigation plan….

What a mitigation plan covers is:

  • Reduce dust emission.
  • Identify and protect cultural, historical and paleontological resources.
  • Protect Soil from erosion.
  • Minimize the extent and amount of ground disturbance.
  • Restore the original grade and reclaim soil and vegetation.
  • Protect wildlife and wildlife habitat.
  • Minimize lighting in offsite areas.
  • Protect human health by minimizing radiological exposure.
  • Ensure the safe and proper transport of generated ore.

The following taken from the U.S. Department of Interior website : http://www.blm.gov/or/energy/uranium.php

Uranium on BLM-Administered Lands in OR/WA

In September 2011, a representative from Oregon Energy, L.L.C. (formally Uranium One), met with local citizens, and county and state officials, to discuss the possibility of opening a uranium oxide (“yellowcake”) mine in southern Malheur County in southeastern Oregon. Oregon Energy is interested in developing a 17-Claim parcel of land known as the Aurora Project through an open pit mining method. Besides the mine, there would be a mill for processing. The claim area occupies about 450 acres and is also referred to as the “New U” uranium claims.

On May 7, 2012, Oregon Energy LLC made a presentation to the BLM outlining its plans for development for the mine.

The Vale District has agreed to work with Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife on mitigation for the “New U” uranium claims, which are located in core sage grouse habitat. Although the lands encompassing the claims have been designated core, the area is frequented by rockhounds and hunters, and has a crisscrossing of off-highway vehicle (OHV) roads and other significant land disturbance from the defunct Bretz Mercury Mine, abandoned in the 1960s.

However, by the fall of 2012 the company said that it was putting its plans for the mine on hold until the uncertainty surrounding sage grouse issues was resolved.

Location information for the Aurora Project can be found on the “Non-Renewable Energy Projects of Oregon” map at this website: http://www.blm.gov/or/energy.

What you do not realize is how insidious the taking of land is for the sale of Uranium. The sage grouse issue is to make people believe that all the land taking  is to save something for the future generation. The Federal government has pushed through the sale which in turn pushes the purchase of property by any means. The BLM (federal organization) will harass property owners. They will lie to property owners, telling them they will be fined if they do anything on their own land that threatens a lizard,  an owl habitat, a fish habitat, a sage grouse.

The Federal agencies will even go so far as to put an innocent law-abiding citizen in Federal prison to accomplish their goal. Especially if that citizen is holding up a project.

 

Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, Uranium, Uranium One

Uranium Connection and the land in Southern Oregon…..

 

Agenda 21/Agenda 2030 at work thru our past secretary of state. I posted about Uranium One https://losingamericanland.com/2016/11/06/proof-of-uranium-one.

I followed the money and the reasons why land was being taken in Harney County Oregon. This is why Dwight Hammond (age 74) is sitting in a federal prison. Initially the sentence for Dwight (Father) was 3 months in prison and Steven (son) was 12 months in federal prison. Both were also stipulated to pay $400,000 to the BLM. The judge said “that sentence is too short”.  Sometime in June 2014, Rhonda Karges, Field Manager for the BLM, and her husband Chad Karges, Refuge Manager for the Malheur Wildlife Refuge (which surrounds the Hammond ranch), along with attorney Frank Papagni exemplified further vindictive behavior by filing an appeal with the 9th District Federal Court seeking Dwight’s and Steven’s return to federal prison for the entire 5 years. The Hammonds serve their original sentences and to date they have paid $200,000 to the BLM, and the remainder $200,000 must be paid before the end of year (2015). If the Hammonds cannot pay the fines to the BLM, they will be forced to sell the ranch to the BLM or face further prosecution. (Coercion to sell their ranch , I think so).See the history of Dwight and Steven Hammond: http://www.prcforum.com/forum/157-political-discussions/69473-history-behind-hammond-ranch-blm.html

Incidentally the Hammond Ranch is surrounded by the Malheur Wildlife Refuge.

The out cry resulted in a take over of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge and the murder of a man who had not even a parking ticket on his record. Yes murder is a harsh way to put the killing of a man by the FBI.

The reasons why this happened goes deeper than the take-over of the wildlife refuge.

The Uranium One  deal had already been done and the project to start mining the Uranium was being held up by one rancher who would not sell his land to the federal government. Making it look like the reasons for doing all the land buying was the save the grouse campaign. When in fact it was a Uranium deal negotiated by the Federal government. Go to the mitigation plan and the environmental impact statement to see how much land is needed.

The UN mandate to take the land for ecology purposes were also a front for acquiring the land in order to get at one of the bigger uranium deposits in the US. Incidentally there are large deposits of gold also.

I discovered this during the Burns Oregon standoff January 2016. The mitigation of such a project usually takes large parcels of land to satisfy the UN mandates on ecology and wildlife. A mitigation plan does not actually take into account human lives that will be affected and they (the feds, the UN, government officials involved) do anything to force a  sale of needed property. The facade of a payment looks good to the populous but the price is never a fair market value of the land. As a matter of fact all kinds of very interesting things happen to a persons land that is targeted by the BLM. Sudden devastating flooding, enormous fires, limited access, new regulations and even threats of jail time if you don’t obey an implied regulation and or policy. If a biologist has identified a possible, endangered species on your land, you will be fined and or arrested for endangering the said species.

The devastation of flooding to a rancher is “Not only can you not grow your winter feed but it kills all of your perennial grasses” This can mean sure financial hardship.

A simplest solution has been sought — a canal to drain the water from the closed basin into the Snake River — But when the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers determined the project’s benefit-to-cost ratio was too low http://www.disasternews.net/news/article.php?articleid=742 Theres the Army Corps of engineers in their infinite wisdom rearing their ugly head. Lets see where else have we heard them doing untoward things to people —mmmm  oh yes the flooding in New Orleans after Katrina, They conveniently did not fix the dyke—- That’s right! They had the money but just didn’t fix it!https://wordpress.com/post/losingamericanland.com/383

The following link is an excellent run down on the fires in Harney county and how the BLM just kept the fire burning in order to burn out the ranchers and devastate them. Please take some time to read it: https://www.thenewamerican.com/usnews/constitution/item/22484-oregon-standoff-blm-s-burn-em-out-legacy-the-untold-backstory

During the 1970’s the Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), in conjunction with the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), took a different approach to get the ranchers to sell. Ranchers were told that, “grazing was detrimental to wildlife and must be reduced”. 32 out of 53 permits were revoked and many ranchers were forced sell. Grazing fees were raised significantly for those that did not sell. Refuge personnel(BLM) took over the irrigation system claiming it as their own.

Human life on a ranch is a hard life but it is a life that people choose.

If a person looks at what is going on within a 50 mile radius of the Hammond Ranch, the devastation that took place is appalling. Ranches were being bought up by the federal government. Call it BLM or some other agency working to complete a mitigation plan for the preparation to start a mining or multiple mining projects.

Ultimately the injustice of the whole project has hit the core of many people and they took action by taking over the Malheur Wildlife Refuge, in order to make the American people aware of the unlawful methods of the Federal Government and their hired mercenaries.

When connecting the dots the purchase of Uranium by the Russian company killed Lavoy Finicum and put an innocent hard-working rancher in Federal Prison.

Mineral resources in Harney County Oregon

https://www.blm.gov/or/energy/uranium.php

http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2012/01/malheur_county_targeted_for_go.html

Other examples of BLM buying land……

http://blog.oregonlive.com/myoregon/2010/03/oregon_buys_land_for_blm.html

http://www.mailtribune.com/article/20150113/News/150119865

1986 BLM purchase in Harney county and today BLM operates a ranch?  https://www.blm.gov/visit/riddle-brothers-ranch-national-historic-district

https://www.blm.gov/visit/diamond-craters-outstanding-natural-area

https://www.blm.gov/visit/steens-mountain-cmpa

https://www.blm.gov/visit/birch-creek-historic-ranch

https://www.blm.gov/visit/mann-lake-recreation-site

https://www.blm.gov/visit/mickey-hot-springs

https://www.blm.gov/visit/steens-mountain-wilderness

https://www.blm.gov/visit/jackman-park-recreation-site

 

I must add that all “International Obligations” will trump any and all need to reserve, preserve or otherwise save land. Now that said there is an agenda at the UN that will force preservation of land, but that of course will be considered an “International obligation”. When any of the Federal alphabet soups are told to do something to meet the “International Obligation” all bets are off. The alphabet soup bunch will carry out any and all untoward actions to secure whatever obligation is required. Coercion, demonizing, destruction of life, destruction of property and imprisonment, to accomplish their goal. The alphabet soup bunch sees this as thier duty to accomplish the “International Obligation by any means”. Until the American people see this as truth and stand up to this it will continue to happen. In this that is why we see the continual abuse of the Bundy family, the Hammond family, Lavoy Finicum and many others that have never been put in the spot light, as these people have.

Save

Agenda 21, Biosphere, BLM, politics, Uranium, Uranium One

More Uranium One and the need for Uranium….

Is NUCLEAR ENERGY Really GREEN? Canada is burning so more Nuclear weapons and power can be made!

http://www.canada.com/calgaryherald/news/calgarybusiness/story.html?id=e1da89f1-0f1e-4aa0-ac04-a34fb02cabb8

The following companies are performing uranium prospecting and/or exploration in Alberta: CanAlaska Ventures Limited , Firestone Ventures Inc. , International Ranger Corp. , Marum Resources Inc. , North American Gem Inc. , Geo Minerals Ltd. , AREVA Resources Canada Inc., Solitaire Minerals Corp. , Thelon Ventures Ltd. , Triex Minerals Corporation , Yellowcake PLC , Roughrider Uranium Corp., Fission Uranium Corp. , Tribune Minerals Corp. , Black Hawk Exploration Inc. , DNI Metals Inc. , Brazil Resources Inc.

The following link is a PDF file that is a summary from the  Alberta Geological Survey. The summary describes the investigation for uranium potential of Southern Alberta since 2006:

http://cseg.ca/assets/files/resources/abstracts/2010/0525_GC2010_Sandstone-Hosted_Uranium_in_Southern_Alberta.pdf

This link shows Canada Uranium production:

http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/country-profiles/countries-a-f/canada-uranium.aspx

More companies looking at Uranium Mining in the fire zone:

http://www.athabascanuclear.com/

http://atomenergyinc.com/

 

The following is a news release off of the Uranium One website:

Bay Adelaide Centre • Suite 1710, Box 23
Toronto • ON • CANADA • M5H 2R2
Uranium One Inc. Announces Termination of Debentures and Application to Cease to be a Reporting Issuer
TORONTO, January 30, 2015/CNW/ – Uranium One Inc. (“Uranium One” or the “Corporation”) today announced that it plans to discharge its outstanding unsecured subordinated debentures. The debentures, of which C$32.524 million principal amount is outstanding, are listed for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) under the symbol “UUU.DB.A.” and are scheduled to mature on March 13, 2015.
The Corporation intends to discharge the trust indenture governing the debentures, and to immediately terminate the debentures, as of February 5, 2015. Uranium One will pay to debentureholders of record as of that date the principle amount of the debentures, plus the interest payments on the debentures through to their scheduled maturity date. The funds will be deposited with the indenture trustee. As soon as it is practical after the discharge, the debentures will be de-listed from the TSX.
In connection with the termination of the debentures, Uranium One applied to the securities regulatory authorities in each of British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, and Newfoundland and Labrador for a decision deeming it to have ceased to be a reporting issuer in such jurisdictions.
If the requested decision is made by the securities regulatory authorities, the Corporation will cease being a reporting issuer in any jurisdiction in Canada and, as a result, will no longer be required to file financial statements and other continuous disclosure documents with Canadian securities regulatory authorities. The Corporation will continue to make the disclosures required to the holders of its remaining securities outstanding, being its Ruble Bonds Series 1 and 2 and the Senior Secured Notes issued by Uranium One Investments Inc.
About Uranium One:
Uranium One is one of the world’s largest uranium producers with a globally diversified portfolio of assets located in Kazakhstan, the United States, Australia and Tanzania. ROSATOM State Atomic Energy Corporation, through its affiliates, owns 100% of the outstanding common shares of Uranium One.
For further information about Uranium One, please visit http://www.uranium1.com
| 2
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT:
Chris Sattler
Chief Executive Officer
Tel: +1 647 788 8500
Juliana Lam
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Tel: +1 647 788 8500
Cautionary Statement
No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or disapproved the information contained herein.
Forward-looking statements:
This press release contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of applicable securities laws that are intended to be covered by the safe harbours created by those laws, including statements that use forward-looking terminology such as “may”, “will”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “believe”, “continue”, “potential”, or the negative thereof or other variations thereof or comparable terminology. Such forward-looking statements may include, without limitation, statements regarding the completion of the proposed discharge of debentures and other statements that are not historical facts. While such forward-looking statements are expressed by Uranium One, as stated in this release, in good faith and believed by Uranium One to have a reasonable basis, they are subject to important risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from future results expressed, projected or implied by the forward-looking statements. As a result of these risks and uncertainties, the results or events predicted in these forward-looking statements may differ materially from actual results or events. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, given that they involve risks and uncertainties. Uranium One is not affirming or adopting any statements made by any other person in respect of the proposed discharge of the debentures and expressly disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except in accordance with applicable securities laws, or to comment on expectations of, or statements made by any other person in respect of the proposed transaction. Investors should not assume that any lack of update to a previously issued forward-looking statement constitutes a reaffirmation of that statement. Reliance on forward-looking statements is at investors’ own risk.