Example of taking land at any cost……..

Gold Butte National Monument (Gabriel Utasi/Las Vegas Review-Journal)

Image result for map of bundy ranch

We now have a perfect example again of taking land at any cost. Obama has, by the stroke of a pen taken large swaths of land for a national monument. If this isn’t enough the feds make a point to take land that has been involved in a controversy with the people. The feds did not like the fact that they had to back down so, after enough time has passed and the American people have forgotten all about it. The feds hate to lose, so they stomp their proverbial feet and abuse their power.
The feds had to back off from a land taking, bullying issue and they are like a bully on the play ground. They did not get their own way so they take a different strategy to take the land anyway. They couldn’t take it by buying it, they couldn’t take it by fining the owner, they couldn’t take it by damaging property, they couldn’t take it by force so they use the pen of the white house to take it.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/12/28/presidential-proclamation-establishment-gold-butte-national-monument
You may say they did not take the land that was privately owned, that may or may not be true! But, by making the property adjacent to the land will mean that the property owner will be put under an exorbitant amount of restriction as to what they will be able to do on the land. If any of the restrictions are violated, even if the restriction goes completely against common sense and constitutional right, fines will be imposed up to and including federal jail time.
We have already seen the federal over reach with the Oregon gentlemen ( Mr Hammond who sits in federal prison). Mr Hammond would not be bullied, he would not sell, he sucked it up and paid fines and still ended up in federal prison. These people know that if they wait out Mrs. Hammond and wait till she is financial troubled or becomes elderly enough to go into a nursing home they will swoop in and take the land. They hope the same thing will happen with the Bundy ranch.

Everyone says “oh they can’t do that” or ” that wouldn’t happen” or even still “why would they do that”.

Those that say these things are in the dark, they are gullible sheeple. They will believe anything the feds tell them.

All over the country as well as the world the land grabs have been going on unchecked and unabated. As long as a fantasy football season is in play there is no one to stop this bunch from implementing Agenda 21 (now known as Agenda 30).

The following articles include eminent domain, and other methods of takings…

https://losingamericanland.com/2016/12/04/eminent-domain-rears-its-ugly-head-again/

https://losingamericanland.com/2016/07/26/property-rights-vs-environmental-takings/

https://losingamericanland.com/2016/05/10/uranium-one-and-eastern-oregon/

https://losingamericanland.com/2016/03/04/reports-company-tied-to-reids-son-wants-land-in-bundy-standoff/

https://losingamericanland.com/2016/02/12/forcing-a-sale-by-any-means/

https://losingamericanland.com/2016/02/01/how-the-epa-separates-landowners-from-their-properties-the-ppj-gazette/

https://www.texastribune.org/2015/11/17/red-river-landowners-take-battle-feds-court/

https://losingamericanland.com/2014/05/24/mitigation-plan-for-nevada-solar-farm-part-2/

 

Germany WILL ban the burka: Ministers ‘to order Muslim women to show faces in public’

Global Geopolitics

GERMAN ministers have said they will bring in an effectual ban on the burka by making it illegal for women not to show their faces in public.

Senior members of Angela Merkel’s ruling coalition struck a compromise after the leader expressed unease about the full face veil, but appeared to come out against officially outlawing it.

They will now not legally ban the burka, but will instead bring in new laws requiring people to show their faces in public streets as well as in courts, offices and schools, which will effectively render the garment illegal.

View original post 365 more words

Germany Hardens on Immigrants and Islam

Global Geopolitics

(Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images)

Germany plans to ban the burka. Will states turn a blind eye to anti-migrant violence.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s decision to open the door to thousands of immigrants has proven the most significant of her long chancellorship. Every bit as important is her repeated refusal to backtrack. The pragmatist who defined her chancellorship by following public opinion stood firm.

Or, rather, stood firmish. While she has not abandoned her position completely, she has certainly shuffled away from it. German attitudes to both Islam and immigration are hardening in a way that not even Ms. Merkel can resist.

View original post 674 more words

Eminent Domain rears its ugly head again…..

How soon the American public forgets……. It was not to long ago that people on the east coast were having their property taken away by eminent domain, all for the purpose of increased tax dollars. The couple that had their house taken away from them all for a shopping mall.  The house was bulldozed and the land sits empty.

The following are other examples of eminent domain and a definition of eminent domain;

http://mentalfloss.com/article/63514/7-maddening-examples-eminent-domain

http://money.cnn.com/2005/06/23/news/fortune500/retail_eminentdomain/index.htm

http://www.fostereast.com/Practice-Areas/Eminent-Domain-Condemnation.shtml

http://jeffersonpost.com/opinion/2600/railroading-eminent-domain

https://ihaveagripe.wordpress.com/2016/04/24/the-absurdity-of-eminent-domain/

https://wordpress.com/read/blogs/88075194/posts/12768

https://wordpress.com/read/blogs/104674524/posts/6871

https://wordpress.com/read/blogs/15909850/posts/486647

https://wordpress.com/read/blogs/111228489/posts/55

https://wordpress.com/read/blogs/109115064/posts/260

 

You may think this is all a good idea for more taxes to go to public needs. The biggest problem with this issue is that when the government or a non-profit does it the price they offer for the luxery to eminent domain someones property is pennies on the dollar. There is no fair market value offered. Once an eminent domain form is signed by the owner they have to accept what is given there is no negotiating price. It is called the legal form of “take it or leave it”. I repeat there is nothing FAIR about it.

Now we have another government organization saying they will eminent domain property on an indian reservation with a long stand treaty to not be disturbed. The corporations involved with the pipeline cutting right thru Standing Rock  reservation land are stickin’ it to the indians again. This time the corporations are saying that the oil pipeline is more important than the indigenous people. Where is the UN Agenda 21 committees on Indigenous people.

THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS HAS NO AUTHORITY IN OUR STATES!

Once again whitey is breaking a long-standing treaty with the native people. This issue is not just about the native people it is about the issue of eminent domain and big corporatism.

This eminent domain is against all precepts of our constitution. It is also ethically wrong to just take people’s property to achieve some corporations lust for more.

THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS HAS NO AUTHORITY IN OUR STATES!

This is no difference between the Hammonds in Oregon and the Standing Rock issue.. You may say it is very different but when you find out why things are being done it boils down to corporate money. The Hammond land was/is holding up the Uranium mining. The Standing Rock issue  is holding up big corporate oil companies and big bankers.

Just like the BLM the army corps of engineers do not have a legal right to own land in any state.

Does this look familiar?

Does this look familiar?

 

Image result for Lavoy Finicum Dead Body

 

See the same thing happening! All for a corporation!

THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS HAS NO AUTHORITY IN OUR STATES!

What on earth is the Army Corp of Engineers doing acquiring land for corporations anyway???? This Army Corps of Engineers is not even a legitimate or legal entity that should be telling the American people what they can and cannot do. I will bet you that any documentation and  permits that were required by them were passed with flying colors. I will also  bet you that no mitigation plan for said pipeline was done with DUE DILIGENCE at all. What authority do they have in our states.

Did the mitigation plan include the purchase of land afected by the pipeline probabaly not. This information would be found in the environmental impact statement done by the lead entity of the project.

THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS HAS NO AUTHORITY IN OUR STATES!

Please watch these videos to get an understanding of whats happening:

Move if you don’t like How things are done…..

e8ffe01c2d13a1f3934aa25b069de49f

I have not weighed in on all the hoopla around Donald Trump and the election but I think it is time….

With all of the colleges and Universities treating our 20 somethings like little kids that need a hug. I am really appalled at the incitement of the young, to take to the streets and protest. The protesting is a real way to start a move like the 60’s but I do not remember anyone beating pregnant women on the way to the hospital or braking car windows to get your point across.

I think that the ultimate dumbing down of our youth has finally happened, when college campuses have to provide group hugs, scheduled “cry-ins”, post-election safe spaces with bubbles, Legos,Play-Doh,  hot chocolate, therapy dogs, coloring books, calming music and videos of puppies. Even going so far as to “cancel scheduled test”!

I knew that Agenda 21 had plans to dumb down people make them weak and re-engineer people’s thinking. Real social engineering. Between the vaccines and the trophies and the entitlements that have been thrust upon them. The cradle to grave agenda is working.  These kids that are now in College are the kids that have been brainwashed into believing that the oceans are rising, the icebergs all over the world are disappearing, the rain is stopping, the ozone is being eaten up, and the rain forest is all but gone, along with much much more. The environment is in severe peril that all human life must cease to exist for this planet to live. Mommy and daddy government is the only hope for the environment.

The college student today has never seen real trials and tribulations in their life. They have never had to gather food to eat. They have never had to fix something to keep it running. They have never had to really count their pennies just to eat. They have never had to walk to get anywhere. They have never had to go without.

The college student today are the most pampered, mollycoddled, spoiled, pandered to, overindulged and  over-protected. These kids have been abuse by their parents. Theses kids parents have lied to them. They have been using them. They have been playing games with them. These kids have had an injustice done to them by their parents and every adult in their life.

Why are these kids even using every penny to stay in college and get an education. Number one an education is highly overrated. Number these kids know nothing when they graduate. And number three they don’t care if they know anything.

These entitled kids are truly disenfranchised. But not for the reasons you think. Many of them are so brainwashed and disillusion at life that they have no hope. With no hope there is no desire to improve. With no hope they have no faith, no faith in anything. Unfortunately they don’t even feel inadequate. They have been given an inflated sense of who they are but they have not been given any hope.

Someone has given them another brainwashing. They think they have been jilted. So they protest, unfortunately they have been stirred up to a frenzy by an organization that wants them to believe that our democracy is wrong and they should change it. They have also been led to believe that their feelings are the only thing that matters, so you change everyone else to suit your feelings.

So my suggestion is to buck-up buttercup, quit being a mamby-pamby, get over it , grow some cojones, quit your cry-ins quit playing with your plah-doh, get some counselling from a real professional and quit your complaining.

gunny

‘Suck it up, buttercup!’: Iowa lawmaker proposes bill punishing schools coddling anti-Trump students — Brittius

Originally posted on tomfernandez28’s Blog: http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Students-protest-trump-win-1280×720.jpg by MIKE OPELKA Following Donald Trump’s win in Tuesday’s presidential election, many high school and college students were having a tough time dealing with the reality of the results. There were reports of mass walkouts, protests and students gathering on campuses to mourn Hillary Clinton’s loss in what…

via ‘Suck it up, buttercup!’: Iowa lawmaker proposes bill punishing schools coddling anti-Trump students — Brittius

Proof of “Uranium One”

The following information is taken dirrectly from  https://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/press-release
This shows the connection with the Uraniom in Oregon sold to “Uranium One” The Hammonds should never have been talked to by the Feds. Mr Hammond should never be fined or put in federal prison.

Today WikiLeaks begins its series on deals involving Hillary Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta. Mr Podesta is a long-term associate of the Clintons and was President Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff from 1998 until 2001. Mr Podesta also controls the Podesta Group, a major lobbying firm and is the Chair of the Center for American Progress (CAP), a Washington DC-based think tank. Part 1 of the Podesta Emails comprises 2,060 emails and 170 attachments and focuses on Mr Podesta’s communications relating to nuclear energy, and media handling over donations to the Clinton Foundation from mining and nuclear interests; 1,244 of the emails reference nuclear energy. The full collection includes emails to and from Hillary Clinton.

In April 2015 the New York Times published a story about a company called “Uranium One” which was sold to Russian government-controlled interests, giving Russia effective control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for the production of nuclear weapons, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of US government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off the deal was the State Department, then headed by Secretary Clinton. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) comprises, among others, the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy.

As Russian interests gradually took control of Uranium One millions of dollars were donated to the Clinton Foundation between 2009 and 2013 from individuals directly connected to the deal including the Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Telfer. Although Mrs Clinton had an agreement with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors to the Clinton Foundation, the contributions from the Chairman of Uranium One were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons.

When the New York Times article was published the Clinton campaign spokesman, Brian Fallon, strongly rejected the possibility that then-Secretary Clinton exerted any influence in the US goverment’s review of the sale of Uranium One, describing this possibility as “baseless”.

Mr Fallon promptly sent a memo to the New York Times with a rebuttal of the story (Podesta Email ID 1489).

In this memo, Mr Fallon argued: “Apart from the fact that the State Department was one of just nine agencies involved in CFIUS, it is also true that within the State Department, the CFIUS approval process historically does not trigger the personal involvement of the Secretary of State. The State Department’s principal representative to CFIUS was the Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs. During the time period in question, that position was held by Jose Fernandez. As you are aware, Mr Fernandez has personally attested that “Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter.”

What the Clinton campaign spokesman failed to disclose, however, was the fact that a few days before sending his rebuttal to the New York Times, Jose Fernandez wrote on the evening of the 17 April 2015 to John Podesta following a phone call from Mr Podesta (Email ID 2053): “John, It was good to talk to you this afternoon, and I appreciate your taking the time to call. As I mentioned, I would like to do all I can to support Secretary Clinton, and would welcome your advice and help in steering me to the right persons in the campaign”.

Five days after this email (22 April 2015), Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon wrote a memo to the New York Times, declaring that “Jose Fernandez has personally attested that ‘Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter’,” but Fallon failed to mention that Fernandez was hardly a neutral witness in this case, considering that he had agreed with John Podesta to play a role in the Clinton campaign.

The emails show that the contacts between John Podesta and Jose Fernandez go back to the time of internal Clinton campaign concern about the then-forthcoming book and movie “Clinton Cash” by Peter Schweizer on the financial dealings of the Clinton Foundation.

In an email dated 29 March 2015 (Email ID 2059), Jose Fernandez writes to Podesta: “Hi John, I trust you are getting a brief rest after a job well done. Thanks no doubt to your recommendation I have joined the CAP [Center for American Progress] board of trustees, which I’m finding extremely rewarding.”

Julian Assange