Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, Biosphere, ecology now, NGO'S (non-government organizations), Political Correctness, Wetland

Water, Water, everywhere not a drop to drink….

Why do you think that the EPA, Water Quality, Save the fish people, Save the bird people are all on board with water rights and property rights issue. Because that is where the control of the people is. If they have complete control of every drop of water in the nation let alone the world they can control the people. The Agenda is to move people into the cities or more populated areas so they can control how we treat nature there is a move on to get areas of our nation into, ” no walking zones”. These zones are currently called Biospheres. This way the natural environment can thrive (in theory). But it will be about the rich can go do their thing on the no walk zones. This is not a conspiracy theory this is real. Read the whole Agenda 21 booklet, then educate yourself on the UN and their plans.

Every one is kidding themselves if they think that the ecology groups under the guise of  Water quality, EPA, Endangered species act, Air Quality and other governmental organizations are here to help the people live better lives. These organizations have been hijacked by the same people who are taking land from the people. Just look at the Cliven Bundy situation. Don’t just read the story on him, look behind the scenes and see what is happening around him and 100 miles away. Follow the money behind those scenes and you will see what is really happening.

Snake river Idaho
Snake river Idaho

I have actually seen the plan of an ecology group, their plan is to buy up 200 acres both side of the Snake River from mouth to headwaters. They are patient and exacting. They have a plan and they WILL carry out their plan no matter what it takes. They are not ethical about it. They are not honest about it. They, being the NGO’s that work to change nature laws to benefit them.

This is NOT a Right or Left issue. This is not a Carter, Bush, Reagan, Nixon, Clinton or Obama issue. This is a much larger issue. The different administrations have just implemented little pieces. The latest administration is young enough and have been indoctrinated enough, to believe that the save the planet issue is the most important. In order to implement a UN Agenda to the United States there is a constitution standing in the way. So what better to do indoctrinate a generation into thinking that the world leaders know better know how to save the planet, so wipe away the constitution to implement world laws.

Tax the dickens out of urban areas and it will empty out. Fine people for building on their own property and people will not buy land. Regulate what can be grown on your own land and people become leery. Make the land so expensive and no one but the big boys(girls) can buy.

There is a plan and children your children are being indoctrinated into it. The uninformed are being indoctrinated. The ignorant are being indoctrinated. The American people are being kept busy trying to keep a roof over their heads and food on the table are being indoctrinated.

Cities across the nation are doing the sustainable thing to indoctrinate the people into a plan that will control them for the greater good. WHO’S GREATER GOOD? is the question everyone should be asking.  Why did the landslide take place in Washington state and kill people? Why is the Katrina money not rebuilding New Orleans? Why are people still waiting on the money for the devastation of Hurricane Sandy.


Agenda 21 impact, GO's (Government Organizations), Political Correctness, politics, small community life

Agenda 21 Verbal Vomit…

I was reading a blog today about something someone was a part of.  They were a guest on the blog and spit out their experience and observation of what they learned when attending something as a senior fellow. There experience was so enlightening to them they felt like contributing to a blog and the $10 dollar words used to define an issue and relate the feel of the experience was like reading a legal description with more verbiage than is necessary. If you read an EPA policy you will see that they try to use as many $10 words as they can to describe a stick in the water and how it will affect the science and the atmosphere and the impressions of the fish and how the fish feel about it and the affects it will have on the human experience and how the water scientifically flow past it and over it and yadda, yadda, yadda.

The biggest problem I see with every group on the planet is they feel that if they use the language of kings and scholars they will be seen as the educated expert they might very well be. These are the exact reasons why people get board with scientist and politicians. These people do not and will not keep it simple. They will not describe anything in common sense simple terms. It is beneath them to do such a thing. If they only knew???

A sample:

Under the aegis of the United Nations and the leadership of its Secretary General, Mr. Ban Ki-Moon, the international community is currently preparing the Post-2015 Development Agenda. Member states are key actors in the process which also takes into account civil society, through the Major Groups.
The organizations and people that sign this document are global cultural actors. We are networks of governmental and non-governmental organizations and all work locally and nationally, connecting local communities to globalization. We are active stakeholders in local and national development policies. We believe strongly that culture can aid the fight against poverty and strengthen communities. We have witnessed the progress made in recent years and deem that culture is not only at the centre of the challenges at stake but also an essential component of the answer.
We have written this document to support the efforts that are carried out at a global level. It is a natural step. Only the explicit inclusion of culture in the Post-2015 Development Agenda will enable transformative change. The Post-2015 Development Agenda is a unique opportunity to enshrine internationally what is already a reality in the world.

We share the conviction that the Post-2015 Development Agenda needs to be based on the following four building-blocks:
l A far-reaching vision of the future firmly anchored in human rights and universally accepted values and principles, including those encapsulated in the UN Charter, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Millennium Declaration;
l A set of concise goals and targets aimed at realizing the priorities of the agend;
l A global partnership for development to mobilize implementation; and
l A participatory monitoring framework for tracking progress and mutual accountability mechanisms for all stakeholders

We believe that it is important that the goals of the Post-2015 Development Agenda be as specific as possible in laying out a single challenge and ambition. We believe that the focus should be on issues with the greatest impact on sustainable development, measured in terms of the number of people affected, the contribution to social inclusion, and the need to move towards sustainable consumption and production patterns. Culture matches all these criteria. Also, each goal should have ‘knock on’ effect in other areas so that the set of goals, taken together, is truly transformative: culture is important in itself but it also has an enormous impact on the struggle to end poverty, ensure gender equality, improve health outcomes, foster job creation, sustain peaceful societies and good governance. We also believe that each Goal should call to its constituencies, resources, and issues; this we ourselves guarantee in the case of culture.
We therefore call on governments and policy-makers, who are defining the post-2015 UN global development framework and its goals, to seize this unique opportunity, and we request that a specific goal focused on culture, based on heritage, diversity, creativity and the transmission of knowledge, with clear targets and indicators, be included as part of the Post-2015 Development Agenda.
We are ready to work hard and to convince those who still have doubts. We emphasize our commitment to the success of the process of elaborating a sustainable development agenda and our will to become the best partners in contributing to its implementation.

 In other words lets hijack every culture so we can control it!


Agenda 2030, Agenda 21, Agenda 21 impact, Political Correctness, Strong cities, strong communities, sustainable development

Must see video on sustainable development..

Please watch this video to get back ground on what is happening to our way of life. Defines sustainable development


After you see this video talk to neighbors and others on social media to stop the development of a dystopian society. Sustainable development is a key word for Agenda 21.

Agenda 21 impact, ecology now, politics

The answers to “Who is saying This”

Barack Obama

1)”I think the trick is figuring out how do we structure government systems that pool resources and hence facilitate some redistribution because I actually believe in redistribution, at least at a certain level to make sure that everybody’s got a shot.”

United Nations Earth Summit Policy

2)All States and all people shall cooperate in the essential task of eradicating poverty as an indispensable requirement for sustainable development, in order to decrease the disparities in standards of living and better meet the needs of the majority of the people of the world.

Barack Obama

3)”For too long, federal policy has actually encouraged sprawl and congestion and pollution, rather than quality public transportation and smart, sustainable development.  And we’ve been keeping communities isolated when we should have been bringing them together.”

United Nations

4)The right to development must be fulfilled so as to equitably meet developmental and environmental needs of present and future generations.

Agenda 21

5)To provide leadership and encourage partnership in caring for the environment by inspiring, informing, and enabling nations and peoples to improve their quality of life without compromising that of future generations.

Do you think Barack Obama, is saying the Mantra of the day to suit the UN or do you think he really believes what he is saying?